🇲🇲Dear all peace-loving people around the world🇲🇲In the world, human beings are facing various problems. People who are full of greed, anger, and ignorance are seen to be fighting with each other in words and deeds. As the fighting continues, various problems such as civil wars, wars of aggression, and wars of aggression are occurring. As world peace is being destroyed, humans are facing unbearable problems. Innocent children and women are not getting the rights they deserve and deserve. I can't think of one thing every time. What is it? The United Nations. If we look at the responsibilities and duties of the United Nations, I think it is not suitable for solving the problems that are happening in the world today. In fact, the United Nations and the World Security Council, such an organization must rule the world, must be able to give orders, and must have various ways to obey orders. There must be no organization that can influence more than that organization. There should be experts from each country. They can even dominate the superpowers like the US, China, and Britain. Only then will global peace be achieved quickly. Now, if a country with power develops more militarily, economically, or socially than its own country, then powerful countries will jealously seek out enemies and wage war. Or they will attack with fighter jets. In this, innocent people are losing their lives. No one understands the value of a life. You should think about how to achieve global peace by controlling these. If the US continues to be the permanent president of the UN, world peace will never be achieved. If you think carefully, no one sees that they are working for the common good, but for their own benefit, for the benefit of their own country. The permanent president of the UN and the Security Council has rejected this, As a young Rohingya, I have come to realize that only by electing the president and secretary from among the countries in the world through a secret ballot system and governing the world fairly can we achieve global peace. The United Nations and the Security Council are organizations in which any country must govern, give orders, and make them obey their orders. For example, only when a defendant is tried in court can we hold the leaders of the countries in check and control them, can we achieve global peace smoothly. Otherwise, it will not be easy for powerful countries to use various excuses to end this war every year, every year, for the benefit of themselves and their countries. No country's leaders pay any attention to the words of the United Nations and the Security Council. If we look at it in practice, look at the Rohingya issue. Myanmar is a small country. Even that country has been under siege for 8 years. What action can be taken? Why is the UN and the Security Council Powerless? Without such Power, how can the organization bring about global peace? Everyone should think about it. Whether there is a veto or a strong one, all countries in the world can only achieve global peace if they are subject to the UN and the Security Council. Seek peace in the quiet embrace of nature. Peace is an indispensable need of the human race. It is not as if one person can kill another person, and it is as if one country can attack another country, but instead of trying to build peace, we must try to destroy the peace now, and the world is getting hotter and is on the verge of collapse. I especially appeal to all the world experts to urgently try to bring about peace in all parts of the world. Mr, Noor Muhamed Arkhan Rohingya Youth Myanmar
Aug 07, 2013 @ 20:27:52
Reblogged this on Mb Man – My life and commented:
This is something that I have seen pop up again and again latley. People are still going ON AND ON about what Chris did to Rihanna. Was it right? No. Domestic abuse is never right.
But the way ive seen people react to this since, is nothing short of redicules. Like a Care2 petition out of Halifax NS (I believe), which was attempting to block an upcoming proformance from the artist because “what kind of message are we sending if we let someone of his track record proform here?”.
If people do not want to see him, and if people are still angry with him about the past assult, then they will boycott, speak with there wallets. Why is it that you find it nessesary to deprive hundreds (thousands?) of his fans of a show, just because you don’t agree with what he did? Seems rather selfish, don’t it?
Chris Brown is not the first artist to do wrong, and certainly will not be the last. If other people continually judged one by the sins of there past, then there would be no clean people. Though the crimes may be horriffic, there eventually comes a time when you must move on. Im thinking that Rihanna must have by now.
Another question to ask yourself.
Are you STILL going out of this 4 or 5 years later, out of genuine disdain for the act? Or is this just a convenitent selling point for you pro feminist views?
LikeLike