James' World 2

Click the link below the picture

.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon says that it’s certain that AI “will eliminate jobs.” However, he also notes that mastering a few skills can help workers protect themselves.

Dimon, who leads the largest bank in the U.S. with $3.9 trillion in assets, told Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures recently that AI taking over tasks “doesn’t mean that people won’t have other jobs.”

“My advice to people would be critical thinking,” Dimon said in the interview, which aired earlier this week. “Learn EQ [emotional quotient or emotional intelligence], learn how to be good in a meeting, how to communicate, how to write. You’ll have plenty of jobs.”

Critical thinking involves the ability to analyze information and question assumptions, while a high EQ allows workers to handle conflict and collaboration well. Communication and writing skills mean explaining ideas clearly.

Dimon says these skills matter in every field, not just banking. He previously highlighted the importance of soft skills in CEOs, stating last year that good leaders get out from behind their desks to meet and communicate with clients and competitors. They are curious, ask a “million questions” and learn from every interaction, he said.

Other CEOs agree with Dimon that curious minds get ahead. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said in a video published by Amazon last year that the difference between people with successful careers and those who stay “stagnant” is a hunger for learning. “You have to be ravenous and hungry to find ways to learn,” Jassy said.

Research has shown that using AI can lead to a drop in critical thinking skills. A study published earlier this year from MIT suggests that the use of chatbots like ChatGPT could weaken the neural connections that help users process information and think critically.

Brandon Daniels, the CEO of Exiger, an AI-powered supply chain risk management company, told Entrepreneur last month that if AI is used correctly, it actually demands deeper critical analysis, not less.

Daniels agreed with Dimon that workers need to develop critical thinking skills to get ahead in the age of AI and argued that to get the most out of AI, users need to fact-check it. Daniels said that the best results arrive when people combine their own judgment with AI, rather than letting the technology do all the work.

“We need more significant critical reasoning skills,” Daniels said. “The AI, in order to be effective, has to understand the nuances of your question, and you have to understand the limitations of the response.”

.

Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan Chase. Photographer: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour concluded a year ago in Vancouver, but the pop superstar isn’t done with her record-breaking live show just yet. On Friday, she dropped the concert film “The Eras Tour: The Final Show” on Disney+ along with the first two episodes of a behind-the-scenes six-part documentary series, “The End of an Era.”

While cameras captured preparation for the tour long before its first date in March 2023, the crew was supposed to join Swift on the road in Vienna in August 2024. But her three shows in that city were canceled after two men were arrested and accused of plotting a terrorist attack there, with her concerts as a target. The first episode focuses on how Swift struggled to get past that moment, and the second has a lighter feel, capturing how the production continued to evolve on the road (particularly with one amusingly overwhelmed special guest: Florence Welch).

Here are five key takeaways.

Goals for the Eras Tour were always lofty.

“The End of an Era” shows that many people in Swift’s circle — including her mother, Andrea — were skeptical about her idea to make the tour an extravaganza lasting over three hours. But Swift’s intention was always to “over-serve” her fans. Maximalism — and giving attendees an escape from the everyday — was the point.

“We got a list of about 40 songs,” the bassist Amos Heller says. “This is insanity. What are we going to cut? And I think we added three songs.”

The series shows that Swift had specific ideas for the band — there are lots of shots of her enthusiastically air drumming and vocalizing musical parts — and worked out the surprise numbers that varied from night to night with each artist. In one scene, she and Ed Sheeran rehearse their duet on “Everything Has Changed,” intently watching each other’s fingers as they play acoustic guitars.

The Eras Tour was touched by tragedy.

The first episode digs into how Swift handled two frightening events that happened in quick succession. In late July 2024, three children died after a knife attack in Southport, England, at a Swift-themed dance class. The next month, Swift’s Vienna dates were called off after the thwarted terrorist attack. As Swift planned to return to the stage in London, cameras caught her battling what she called a “physical reaction” to her nerves. “It sort of feels like we’ve done like 128 shows so far but this is the first one where I feel like, I don’t know, like I’m skating on thin ice,” she says.

In interviews, Swift likens her job to a pilot flying a plane, where she has to remain calm so nobody else has a sense of alarm. Though she breaks down following a private meeting with survivors of the Southport attack and families affected by it, the show must go on: “It’s my job to be able to handle all these feelings and then perk up immediately to perform.”

Swift loves secrets.

Yes, viewers do see Swift getting into what appears to be a cleaning cart in order to make her way to the stage.

She also details how her team worked surreptitiously to incorporate songs from “The Tortured Poets Department” into the set after its release in April 2024. They constructed a “top secret” facility to rehearse that portion, but couldn’t play the music on speakers as they learned the choreography because it hadn’t been released yet.

Swift’s penchant for secrecy is also invoked when she plans to bring Welch out at Wembley Stadium for a rendition of “Florida!!” Welch, who has headlined arenas for years with Florence + the Machine, is still taken aback by the scale of Eras. (She likens arriving onstage with Swift to landing on Mars.)

Swift has changed her football allegiances.

Swift is engaged to the Kansas City Chiefs’ Travis Kelce, but fans will definitely notice that in footage of early Eras rehearsals, she’s wearing a Philadelphia Eagles sweatshirt. (It’s a display of loyalty to her home state’s team before she switched allegiances.) Kelce doesn’t physically show up in the first two episodes, but his voice is heard in phone calls to Swift, marveling at her onstage skills. She tells him, “Some people get a vitamin drip. I got this conversation.”

Choreography has long been a challenge for Swift.

The second episode focuses heavily on the tour’s dancers as Swift integrates “The Tortured Poets Department” into her set. Viewers get a chance to meet Kameron Saunders, who praises Swift for giving a dancer with his body type a featured role, and Amanda Balen, who was retired and working as an associate to the choreographer Mandy Moore when Swift asked her to appear onstage.

Swift admits that choreography hasn’t always been her strongest suit. “It’s taken me a really long time to be even fine at choreography,” she says. Moore has been able to teach her the moves from a “lyrical perspective.” “I don’t do eight counts,” Swift explains, “I learn based on what syllable of the lyric I’m attaching the movement to, and I can’t really learn any other way.”

.

Taylor Swift onstage at the opening night of the Eras Tour in March 2023.Credit…Cassidy Araiza for The New York Times

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.nytimes.com

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

IGNACE, Ontario, C.E. 51,500—Feloo, a hunter, chews a strip of roasted caribou flank, washing it down with water from a nearby lake. Her boots press into thin soil that, each summer, thaws into a sodden marsh above frozen ground. Caribou herds drift across the tundra, nibbling lichen and calving on the open flats. Hooves sink into moss beds; antlers scrape dwarf shrubs. Overhead, migratory birds wheel and squawk before winging south. Two lakes remain liquid year-round, held open by hidden taliks—oases of water in a frozen land. Beneath it all lies the Canadian Shield: a billion-year-old granite craton, a basement of rock, scarred by ice, that has endured glaciation after glaciation. In 10 or 15 millennia, Feloo’s world will vanish beneath three kilometers of advancing ice.

Feloo is unaware that 500 meters below her feet rests an ancestral deposit of copper, steel, clay, and radioactive debris. Long ago, this land was called Canada. Here, a group known as the Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) built a deep geological repository to contain spent nuclear fuel—the byproducts of reactors that once powered Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick. The vault was engineered to isolate long-lived radionuclides such as uranium 235, which has a half-life that exceeds 700 million years—sealing them away from war, disaster, neglect, sabotage, and curiosity for as long as human foresight could reach.

NWMO issued reports with titles such as Postclosure Safety Assessment of a Used Fuel Repository in Crystalline Rock. These studies modeled future boreal forests and tundra ecosystems, simulating the waxing and waning of vast glacial ice sheets across successive ice ages. They envisioned the lifeways of self-sufficient hunters, fishers, and farmers who might one day inhabit the region—and even the remote possibility of a far-future drill crew inadvertently breaching the buried canisters.

Feloo was born into a world that has remembered none of this. Records of the repository were lost in the global drone wars of C.E. 2323. All that endured were the stories of Mishipeshu, the horned water panther said to dwell beneath the lakes—and to punish those who dig too deep. Some of Feloo’s companions dismiss the legend; others whisper that the earth below still burns with poison. Yet every step she takes is haunted by choices made tens of millennia before—when Canada undertook the Promethean task of safeguarding a future it could scarcely imagine.

In 2024, NWMO announced that Canada’s deep geological repository for spent nuclear fuel would be built in the granite formations of northwestern Ontario, near the Township of Ignace and the Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation. The decision capped off a 14-year siting effort that solicited volunteer host communities and guaranteed them the right to withdraw at any stage of the process. NWMO is now preparing for a comprehensive regulatory review, which will include a licensing process conducted by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. This means the development of impact assessments that will be specific to the Ignace site. NWMO has also pledged an Indigenous-led regulatory process alongside federal oversight, with the Wabigoon Lake Ojibway Nation conducting its own assessments to ensure the project reflects Anishinaabe principles of ecological stewardship. If approvals proceed, construction could begin in the 2030s, and the repository could go into operation in the 2040s.

A deep-time repository, like a deep-space probe, must endure without maintenance or intervention, independently carrying human intent into the far future.

A deep geological repository can be seen as a reverse ark: a vessel designed not to carry valuables forward in time but to seal dangerous legacies away from historical memory. Or it can be understood as a reverse mine: an effort returning hazardous remnants to the Earth rather than extracting resources from it. Either way, it is more than just a feat of engineering. Repository projects weave together scientific reasoning, intergenerational ethics, and community preferences in decisions that are meant to endure longer than empires. As messages to future versions of ourselves, they compel their designers to ask: What symbols, stories, or institutions might bridge epochs? And what does it mean that we are trying to protect future humans who may exist only in our imaginations? I am a cultural anthropologist. From 2012 to 2014, I spent 32 months living in Finland, conducting fieldwork among the safety assessment teams for Onkalo—an underground complex that is likely to become the world’s first operational deep geological repository for spent nuclear fuel. The teams’ work involved modeling far-future glaciations, earthquakes, floods, erosion, permafrost, and even hypothetical human and animal populations tens of millennia ahead. That research became the basis for Deep Time Reckoning, a book exploring how nuclear-waste experts’ long-range planning practices can be retooled as blueprints for safeguarding future worlds in other domains, from climate adaptation to biodiversity preservation.

During the Biden administration, I joined the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Spent Fuel and High-Level Waste Disposition, where I helped advance participatory siting processes modeled on approaches that had proven successful in Finland and Canada. I served as federal manager of the DOE’s Consent-Based Siting Consortia—a nationwide coalition of 12 project teams from universities, nonprofits, and the private sector that were tasked with fostering community engagement with nuclear waste management. Through it all, I came to see repository programs as civilizational experiments in long-term responsibility: collective efforts to extend the time horizons of governance and care so that shared futures may be protected far beyond the scale of any single lifetime or institution.

.

Federico Tramonte

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Democratic Representative Al Green said Friday, after failing to secure enough votes to impeach President Donald Trump, that he would do it again.

In a speech on the House floor, the Texas congressman said he was “a proud, liberated Democrat” despite others in his party voting against him on his resolution to impeach the president.

“I believe in this flag. I believe in liberty and justice for all. I don’t support beneficial bigotry. I don’t support people who desecrate what the flag really means as it relates to the Constitution,” Green said, in part.

Why It Matters

Green has tried multiple times to impeach Trump, and the backfiring of previous attempts appeared to have made Democrats much more cautious about supporting another attempt, particularly with Republicans controlling the House and the Senate.

What To Know

Green, wearing a tie with alternating red-and-white stripes and white stars on a blue background, said he believed in the Pledge of Allegiance and that the tie was a symbol of it.

“There are many people who have said to me that the tie is old, that it appears to be soiled and stained, but it’s my favorite tie, it’s a tie that I will never surrender,” Green said. “It’s a tie that means something to me because it stands for something, it stands for the Pledge of Allegiance.”

Green spoke for around 35 minutes on Friday, saying he was grateful to the lawmakers who showed support for his efforts on Thursday, and drawing on previous examples of scholars and lawmakers who have spoken about the powers of impeachment.

Twenty-three Democrats opposed his motion, while an additional 47 voted “present.” The majority of House Democrats, 140 lawmakers, voted against tabling the resolutions. Additionally, 214 House Republicans voted to table the effort, while six did not vote.

The Texas Democrat said he was not deterred, referencing the “millions” of people who stand against the current administration’s policies, and that he saw no reason not to try to impeach Trump again.

“Those were not the last articles of impeachment that will be brought to the floor, those yesterday HRes939, they’re not the last to be brought to the floor for a vote to remove Donald John Trump from office,” Green said.

Trump was impeached twice previously by the House, first in December 2019 over allegations that he withheld congressionally approved aid to Ukraine in a bid to blackmail a political rival.

The president was then impeached again following the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol carried out by his supporters. That second effort was bipartisan, with 10 House Republicans voting in favor and five GOP senators voting to convict Trump.

While seemingly not willing to impeach the president, Democrats have filed articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. this week.

What People Are Saying

House Democratic leaders in their statement said they’d vote “present”: “Donald Trump’s out-of-control behavior continues to put the health, safety, and economic well-being of the American people at risk. At the same time, House Republicans have zero interest in holding this corrupt administration accountable.”

Florida Republican Representative Mario Díaz-Balart told the Associated Press on Thursday: “It shows you they have no agenda. And so this is the kind of stuff that they’ve been doing, as opposed to actually trying to solve the American people’s issues. This is not a surprise, but it just shows you that the Democrats continue to do the same kind of thing they’ve been doing for years, which is playing games and not coming up with real solutions.”

.

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

In return, the Cuban government, over the years, has sent tens of thousands of medics, sports instructors and, increasingly, security professionals on assignments to Venezuela. That exchange has assumed special importance as Mr. Maduro has leaned on Cuban bodyguards and counterintelligence officers to protect himself against the U.S. military buildup in the Caribbean.

In recent years, however, only a fraction of Venezuelan oil set aside for Cuba has actually reached the island, according to PDVSA documents and tanker tracking data.

Most of the oil allocated for Cuba has instead been resold to China, with the money providing badly needed hard currency for the Cuban government, according to multiple people close to the Venezuelan government.

Some of that money is believed to have been used by Cuban officials to purchase basic goods, though the opacity of the country’s economy makes it difficult to estimate where that money ends up, or how it is spent, or how much goes to business intermediaries with ties to both governments.

On Friday, Cuban officials condemned the American seizure of the tanker, calling it in a statement an “act of piracy and maritime terrorism” that hurts Cuba and its people.

“This action is part of the U.S. escalation aimed at hampering Venezuela’s legitimate right to freely use and trade its natural resources with other nations, including the supplies of hydrocarbons to Cuba,” the statement said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The main person managing the flow of oil between Cuba and Venezuela is a Panamanian businessman named Ramón Carretero, who in the past few years has become one of the largest traders of Venezuelan oil, according to PDVSA data and people close to Venezuela’s government.

The U.S. Treasury Department imposed sanctions on Mr. Carretero on Thursday for “facilitating shipments of petroleum products on behalf of the Venezuelan government.” Mr. Carretero, through a legal representative, declined to comment on the government’s decision. He did not respond to detailed questions for this article.

Mr. Carretero’s role as an economic intermediary between Cuba and Venezuela was first reported by Armando.info, a Venezuelan investigative news outlet.

Skipper, the seized tanker, was carrying oil jointly contracted by Cubametales, Cuba’s state-run oil trading firm, and an oil trading company tied to Mr. Carretero, PDVSA documents show. Overall, Mr. Carretero’s trading companies have accounted for a quarter of the oil allocated by PDVSA for export this year, the documents show.

Cubametales has won contracts to buy about 65,000 barrels a day of Venezuelan oil so far this year, a 29 percent increase from 2024, and a sevenfold increase from 2023, according to PDVSA documents. The U.S. Treasury imposed sanctions on Cubametales in 2019 for buying Venezuelan oil, a move that formed part of Mr. Trump’s previous standoff with Mr. Maduro during his first administration.

The oil from Venezuela that does reach Cuba generates electricity and provides fuel for airplanes and machinery. But it is not enough to prevent widespread power outages that have plagued the island amid a broader economic crisis.

Skipper’s planned voyage shows how, in practice, Cuba benefits from oil trade in Venezuela. Cubametales, the state-run firm, listed the ship’s destination as Cuba, suggesting that all of the company’s allocated 1.1 million barrels were heading to the island.

The tanker, however, ultimately headed to China after offloading only a small fraction of the oil to the Neptune 6 and sending it en route to Cuba, according to a person close to PDVSA.

Then, on Wednesday, as Skipper sailed east in international waters between the islands of Grenada and Trinidad, it fell into a U.S. ambush.

Armed American law enforcement agents wearing camouflaged combat gear rappelled from a helicopter onto the tanker’s deck on Wednesday, according to a video released by the U.S. government and a U.S. official with knowledge of the operation. The crew offered no resistance, and U.S. officials said there were no casualties.

U.S. officials said they would seek a warrant to seize the oil, valued at tens of millions of dollars, adding that the crew had agreed to sail the vessel under Coast Guard supervision to a U.S. port, likely Galveston, Texas.

.

An oil tanker called the Skipper in the southern Caribbean Sea. It was seized by the United States. Credit…Vantor, via Associated Press

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

After my grandmother died, we had to clean out her condominium. Wall to wall and floor to ceiling, her studio apartment in a Berkeley, Calif., high-rise was filled with books. Every surface was stacked with them except for a couple of chairs, the tiny kitchen counter, the bed, and narrow connecting paths like game trails in a forest. The shelves were three books deep and bowed in their middle.

But this wasn’t chaos. Besides being a communist, a labor activist, and a speaker of five languages that I knew of (Yiddish, English, German, some Russian, and some Spanish, in addition to her ability to read Latin), Grandma had been a lecturer in library science at the University of California, Berkeley. Every shelf and every pile was a subject, placed in proximity to related subjects and alphabetized by author.

When my wife and I started excavating, we found another organizational layer. Some of the books had whole magazines stuffed into them—the New Yorker, the London Review of Books, Smithsonian—folded open to an article that was relevant to their enveloping tome. Further into the stacks, a whole other classification system surfaced—articles neatly torn or clipped out, with notes stapled to them on which Grandma’s looping cursive noted their subject and bibliographic metadata.

This was more than a library. Sure, it contained books—objects that convey information—, but the condo itself was an object that conveyed information. It was what historian of memory Mary Carruthers calls an architectural mnemonic—a map of Grandma’s multivariate, interesting, and generally unshakable opinions. Its physical structure at every scale helped her to maintain not just her sources but her ideas and to send them forward in time to when she might need them. “The archive has always been a pledge,” according to a translation of philosopher Jacques Derrida’s book Archive Fever, “and like every pledge, a token of the future.”

Not every pledge gets fulfilled, of course. By the end of her life, my grandmother’s once-pointed mind had become less deft; she couldn’t really understand her own archive anymore. Information theory says that for a message to arrive, both sender and receiver have to agree on its form and timing. And now the receiver was gone. This happens all the time—at the scale of studio apartments and entire societies, on time spans of years or millennia. Even organizations dedicated to creating things and trying to remember them don’t always know how to ensure that those things make it through time. That’s understandable. Nobody really knows how to speak to the future in a way that it will hear.

When we try to unravel information from the past, we’re limited by what archives and nature have preserved. “The technical structure of the archiving archive determines the structure of the archivable content,” as Derrida put it. Take the oldest known piece of human art, a 73,000-year-old drawing of crosshatched red triangles on a chunk of rock. South African archaeologists found it in a cave called Blombos, about 185 miles east of Cape Town. Whether these triangles were a vision of mountains, an econometric chart of the seal harvest or an accident of boredom is lost to time. Maybe humans were constantly going around drawing ochre triangles on fragments of rock, and symbolic thinking was common. Maybe only Paleolithic geniuses did it. Whoever drew that fragment was thinking about something, but no one here in the future can know what.

Even when humans create written language and records, they often fail to send information up the line. Most of what historians know about ancient Greece and Rome is because of a lucky accident—scholars in the Abbasid Caliphate, which extended throughout much of the Middle East, got scrolls from Alexandrian libraries and translated them. But which scrolls never made it? Archaeologists know that a Babylonian copper merchant named Ea-nasir had supply chain problems nearly 4,000 years ago, but only because of the fluke survival of clay tablets saying that happened. The shape of the archive of the past limits the knowledge of the future.

Nobody really knows how to speak to the future in a way that it will hear.

 

The northeastern coast of Japan is dotted with future-message failures—hundreds of “tsunami stones” mark past catastrophes dating back 600 years. One in the village of Aneyoshi denotes the level of a flood in the 1800s and warns people not to build houses any lower along the hillside; others advise people to flee to Nokoriya, the “Valley of Survivors,” or Namiwake, “Waves’ Edge,” the extent of a tsunami in 1611. People mostly ignore them. The Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in 2011 hit that very same coast, swept away a bunch of stones, and killed more than 18,000 people.

Another example: In 1850, on the main canal leading from the Merrimack River to the industrial mill town of Lowell, Mass., James Francis built a dam. As the engineer in charge of Lowell’s water-powered textile mills, Francis was convinced that the Merrimack was liable to flood. So he built a 27-foot-wide, 25-foot-tall, 17-inch-thick palisade out of experimental pressure-treated pine. The cost of a project like this, “Great Gate” in 2025, would be about $413 million. The gate was so heavy that it had no mechanism to raise or lower it—it just hung over the Pawtucket Canal, suspended by a massive iron chain. Locals called it “Francis’s Folly.”

Two years later, a massive rainstorm flooded the Merrimack. At 3:30 in the morning on April 22, 1852, a worker used a chisel to cut the chain. The gate dropped; the town was saved; Boston newspapers hailed Francis as a hero.

In 1936, there was another storm and an even bigger flood. Lowell was doomed! But someone remembered that really big gate. Workers once again rushed to the gatehouse. No one had a key, so they broke in. Someone shined a light into the decaying shack, which was empty except for a spike stuck through the floor. On the wall hung a sledgehammer. Above it, a sign read, “Take the hammer. Hit the pin.” The men followed the instructions. The spike broke the chain; the gate fell; the town was saved. Francis’s message to the future had been received.

.

Federico Tramonte

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

President Donald Trump has in recent months overseen military strikes against alleged “drug smuggling” boats off the coast of Venezuela, ordered a military buildup in its coastal waters, accused its president, Nicolás Maduro, of being part of a drug cartel, and, on Wednesday, seized one of the nation’s oil tankers.

What’s his problem with Venezuela? And why does he seem intent on dragging the U.S. into a war with the South American nation?

On any given day, Trump or his officials may blame Venezuela for sending too many migrants into the U.S., for sending migrants who are gang members, murderers, or other criminals, or for trading valuable resources with America’s enemies.

Trump’s Attorney General Pam Bondi claims the tanker that was just seized off the coast of Venezuela was carrying sanctioned oil intended for Iran. Venezuela has denied this and called Trump’s actions an “act of international piracy.”

Immigration

Trump has frequently accused Venezuela of pouring illegal migrants into the U.S. During his 2024 re-election campaign, Trump regularly told his supporters that Venezuela was “opening up the prisons” and encouraging hardened criminals to flood across America’s borders.

He even cited immigration on Thursday when Fox News’ Peter Doocy asked him about his intentions regarding Venezuela.

“Now that we’ve seized this tanker, is the campaign against Venezuela still just about drugs, or is it now also about oil?” Doocy asked.

“Well, it’s about a lot of things,” Trump replied. “But one of the things it’s about is the fact that they’ve allowed millions of people to come into our country from their prisons, from gangs, from drug dealers, and from mental institutions.”

He then claimed that 12,000 murderers entered the U.S. and insisted that “many of them are from Venezuela.”

As much as he’s spoken about his issues with Venezuelan migrants, immigration isn’t the issue that Trump has used to justify killing people in its recent strikes on what it calls “drug boats”.

Drugs

Trump has accused Venezuela of trafficking drugs into the U.S. and has used those accusations to justify lethal military operations on Venezuelan ships.

Earlier this fall, Trump approved military strikes on Venezuelan boats that his administration claims were used to traffic drugs. In an incident on September 2, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth gave an order to attack a boat carrying 11 people. According to a Washington Post report, Hegseth then ordered a second strike to kill the survivors.

None of the individuals killed in Trump’s boat strikes have been proven to be criminals in a court of law.

The president is not just accusing Venezuela of being the departure point for alleged drug traffickers, but accusing Maduro — the nation’s president — of being a top-level member of a drug cartel that ships drugs into the U.S.

Trump claims that Maduro is the head of the “Cartel de los Soles.” The cartel is a name given to military officers and other officials in the Venezuelan government who are corrupt and engage in drug trafficking. The term has been in use since at least the 1990s and doesn’t necessarily describe a structured organization in the way a typical drug cartel might be organized. Trump has not provided evidence that Maduro is involved in or leading drug traffickers in Venezuela.

On Thursday, the president bragged to Doocy that drug trafficking by sea was down, though his numbers seem suspiciously high.

“If you look at drug traffic, drug traffic by sea is down 92%,” the president claimed. “And nobody can figure out who the eight is, because I have no idea. Anybody getting involved in that right now is not doing well. And we’ll start that on land too. It’s gonna be starting on land pretty soon.”

While drugs may be how Trump is justifying military action, what he really wants may not be what is leaving Venezuela, but what is buried beneath it.

.

White House claims Venezuelan oil tanker was Iran ‘shadow vessel’ and defends seizure

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

From

Click the link below the picture

.

Crunchy on the outside and tender on the inside,  latkes are objectively delicious — and notoriously a pain to prepare. They’re finicky, time-consuming, and physically taxing, but when made correctly (and topped with sour cream and apple sauce), they can be exceptional. We reached out to professional chefs from around the country to discover how to make the best potato pancakes imaginable. Here are the seven of their most essential tips.

Use russet potatoes

“The secret to an excellent latke? Start with selecting the right potato,” says Hillary Sterling, executive chef of Ci Siamo in New York City. The potato variety you select will not only impact the taste and texture of your latke, but also how simple they are to prepare. Sterling opts for russet potatoes, which are drier and starchier than other varieties like Yukon gold. “[This] helps them stick together without adding too much moisture,” says Sterling.

Season immediately after grating

“The best way to ensure the crispiest latkes is to remove as much moisture as possible after you shred the potatoes and onions,” says Eli Sussman, chef and co-owner of Gertrude’s in Brooklyn, New York. One easy way to draw that moisture out is by seasoning the potatoes and onions immediately after shredding. Liad Balki, director of operations at Miznon, suggests placing the potato mixture in a strainer, seasoning it with salt, then letting it rest for 10 to 30 minutes.

Squeeze, squeeze, squeeze

Here comes the challenging bit. The only way to ensure dry shredded potatoes is by using your hands to squeeze or press the starchy water out — a bit of manual labor that makes all the difference. “Once grated, squeeze them like hell in a dish towel,” says 2022 F&W Best New Chef Caroline Schiff. “And when you think you’ve got all the liquid out, squeeze some more.”

How you choose to squeeze the water out is up to you. “You can use a kitchen towel, cheesecloth, or carefully press it through a strainer,” says Sussman. “The key is to get the mixture dry before adding in eggs.”

Add the right binder

While liquid doesn’t benefit a latke, starch certainly does. “When you remove the water, the potato starch goes with it, and you want that starch for binding and crispiness,” says Schiff. So, she adds potato starch back into the mixture — one tablespoon for every pound of potato. You can use store-bought (which comes as a powder) or the starch that sits at the bottom of your strained potato water — in that case, make sure you strain the liquid into a bowl instead of the sink.

For another binding agent, Sterling likes to use grated cheese like young Pecorino or fontina. “It helps hold the mixture together and gives the latkes a nice crispy outside, while still staying creamy on the inside,” she says. 

Pay attention to the oil temperature

Michael King, chef of Sungold and NoMad Diner in New York City, says a candy thermometer is essential for making latkes at home. “If your oil is too cold, your latkes are never going to get crispy enough,” he says. “Because they are really just a loose paste before they’re fried, oil that’s less than hot will seep into the grated potatoes, giving you a result far worse than a limp french fry.” But if your oil is too hot, Schiff says, your latkes will brown too quickly, “leaving the inside raw.” For perfectly golden brown latkes, keep your cooking oil between 350℉ and 375℉.

Don’t overcrowd your pan

Even if you’re making latkes for a crowd, you should avoid frying too many at once. “Don’t overcrowd your pan, as it will rapidly drop the temperature of the oil,” says King. “A good rule of thumb: However big your latkes are, leave that much space between them while frying. It might take longer, but it’s well worth it.”

Cool on a rack

When your latkes are done, do not throw them directly onto a plate. Instead, let them cool on a wire rack. According to chef Michael Hackman of Aioli Sourdough Bakery and Cafe in West Palm Beach, Florida, this ensures that the “bottoms stay crisp instead of steaming into sogginess.”

After all that effort, no one wants to be left with a soggy latke.

.

Credit: Food & Wine / Photo by Victor Protasio / Food Styling by Michelle Gatton / Prop Styling by Christine Keely

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

As the debate turned more tense, several Republicans, both for and against the new map, reported threats or swatting. Long-simmering ideological and stylistic divides among Republicans in Indiana spilled into the open, with many long-serving or institutionalist figures who opposed the map clashing with Trump-aligned conservatives who favored the plan. Republicans would have been expected to flip the only two Democratic-held congressional seats among the state’s nine districts if the new map had passed.

In the end, a slim majority of the Senate’s Republican caucus voted against the map.

That Indiana lawmakers voted at all showed the enduring power that Mr. Trump holds over his party. Many in the State Senate did not want to debate the map, which was proposed outside the usual once-a-decade redistricting cycle, and the chamber’s leadership relented and brought the bill to the floor only after the president and his allies stepped up their pressure campaign. The map’s defeat, though, showed the limits of Mr. Trump’s power to bend Republican officials to his will.

“I believe the bill on its face is unconstitutional,” said State Senator Greg Walker, a Republican who opposes redistricting and who recently reported a swatting incident at his home, a form of harassment in which law enforcement was called to respond to a nonexistent emergency.

Another Republican opposed to the new map, State Senator Spencer Deery, said that “I see no justification that outweighs the harms it would inflict upon the people’s faith in the integrity of our elections and our system of government.” He added that “it’s time to say no to pressure from Washington, D.C.,” and that “it’s time to say no to outsiders who are trying to run our state.”

.

Republicans make up a majority of the Indiana Senate, but more than a dozen voted against President Trump’s new political map, which aimed to add Republicans in Congress.CreditCredit…Jon Cherry for The New York Times

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

The Leonid meteor shower is peaking this week, potentially bringing hundreds of long-tailed meteors with it. This annual fall display is an excellent opportunity to spot fireballs in the night sky.

Meteor showers are the beautiful result of Earth moving through the trail of debris streaming from comets and asteroids as they make their own way around the sun. As these chunks of space rock enter our atmosphere, they burn up as shooting stars. And if they land, they become meteorites.

The Leonids are an annual shower that occurs in early November and lasts through early December, when Earth passes through the stream of debris of Comet 55P/Tempel-Tuttle.

Perhaps the most famous Leonid display in modern memory took place on November 17, 1966, when meteors seemed to fall like rain, and some witnesses said it felt as if Earth was plunging through space.

These storms tend to follow a 33- to 34-year rhythm tied to the comet’s orbit. Most years are quieter, however, which is the most likely outcome this week. The last major event occurred in 2002.

How to Watch the Leonids

The Leonids will reach their peak at 1 P.M. EST on November 17. Hundreds of long-tailed meteors will cross the sky at 44 miles per second, giving sky watchers a good chance to catch the display closer to dawn on November 18.

When many meteors appear to streak from the same point in the night sky, that point is known as the radiant. This year, the shower’s radiant rises around midnight and climbs highest just before dawn, making the predawn hours the best time to watch.

Favorably for sky-gazers, the next new moon will arrive on November 20, which means there is only a thin waning crescent in the sky during the Leonids’ peak this week. Under dark sky conditions, observers might see as many as 10 to 15 Leonids per hour. Experts recommend using binoculars or telescopes and lying flat on your back with your feet toward the east. After about 30 minutes in the dark, your eyes will adjust, and you will begin to see meteors.

.

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________