James' World 2

Click the link below the picture

.

Meta might not be the first company that comes to mind when you think of generative AI, but they are a big part of the current artificial intelligence race. The company has its own AI model, Llama, has added “Meta AI” to all of its big products—whether you like it or not (you don’t). Meta even wants you to try making your own AI bot. It’s safe to say the company is all-in on AI.

But even for a company so committed to AI, this latest story is simply bizarre. It turns out the company has been experimenting with AI-generated user accounts on its platforms since 2023. The Instagram versions of these pages are currently going viral, but they’re also available on Facebook. The accounts are verified, and each is equipped with a unique personality, but they’re completely fraudulent. Each is entirely made up, with posts of AI-generated images.

It’s all very weird, but also not all that new—the profiles were created more than a year ago, and appear to have largely been abandoned. And now that the profiles are getting a lot of online backlash, Meta is actively deleting their content.

Meta’s AI users are an off-putting bunch

It’s not hard to see why the internet has embraced hating these fake people. Take “Liv” (username “himamaliv”), who purports to be a “proud Black queer momma of 2 & truth-teller.” Liv is, of course, not real, nor is the life she posts about on her Instagram. But that doesn’t stop Liv: The creator has posts about raising strong girls, ice skating with her family, and “soaking up all the sun and fun” with “the kiddos.” Each post sports a corresponding image—the beach post shows children playing in the sand, while the ice skating post shows skaters on an ice rink—but all of these images are AI generated.

To Meta’s credit, each picture sports a Meta AI watermark to denote the image isn’t actually real, but it doesn’t make these posts any less creepy. Why is an AI-generated “mother” posting an AI-generated image of her “kids” playing at the “beach?” Who benefitted from the AI-generated coat drive she is proud to have spearheaded?

In her second oldest post, from Sept. 26, 2023, she says “My backyard is my happy place…I’ve thrown so many birthday parties, cookouts, and girls nights in this space that I’ve lost count. Forever grateful for the life I live,” complete with an AI-generated image of a picnic spread. The thing is, Liv has not thrown birthday parties, cookouts, or girls nights in this space. This space doesn’t exist. The life Liv is so grateful to live doesn’t exist.

Liv is following 18 accounts at the time of writing. Thirteen of them appear to be similar AI-generated pages. For example, there’s Becca (dogloverbecca), who posts AI-generated dog content; Brian (hellograndpabiran), who advertises himself as “everybody’s grandpa;” and Alvin the Alien (greetingsalvin), who is, um, an alien.

But not all the posts are AI-generated. Some of them have videos posted to their accounts as well, and while AI-generated video can certainly be convincing these days, I don’t think these videos are AI generated—at least, not all of them. Carter, the AI dating coach, had a cooking video from January 2024 that appeared very much to be real, but it seems Meta nuked all the content. Still, who posted them? To what end?

.

Credit: Jake Peterson

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Viral samples from a patient in Louisiana who was hospitalized with severe H5N1 avian influenza show genetic mutations that could make the pathogen spread more easily among humans, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced in a statement issued on Thursday.

The mutations were found in samples taken from the patient—but not in those from the backyard poultry that were believed to be the source of the infection. This suggests the changes occurred within the patient. While this development has not changed the CDC’s official assessment of risk to the general public, it does indicate that the H5N1 virus is capable of adapting to human airways.

“The detection of a severe human case with genetic changes in a clinical specimen underscores the importance of ongoing genomic surveillance in people and animals, containment of avian influenza A(H5) outbreaks in dairy cattle and poultry, and prevention measures among people with exposure to infected animals or environments,” the CDC statement said.

On December 18 the CDC confirmed the patient in Louisiana had been hospitalized with the first known severe H5N1 infection in the U.S. this year. The virus has been spreading among wild birds for several years. It was detected in U.S. dairy cows in March, and it has since infected hundreds of herds across 16 states. The Louisiana patient’s viral sequence matches a

different strain of the virus called D1.1, which has been detected in wild birds and poultry in the U.S.

The mutations seen in the Louisiana patient’s samples are confined to the virus’s hemagglutinin gene, which encodes proteins that help the virus bind to cells and infect them. These mutations are only rarely seen in people; a few have been reported in severe human cases, all outside of the U.S. One of the changes was detected in viral samples from a teenager in Canada who was hospitalized with a severe H5N1 infection in November. The Louisiana patient’s samples did not show any changes in the N1 neuraminidase section of the virus’s genome or other sections that could make the pathogen less susceptible to antiviral drugs. The sequences are also similar to those of existing H5N1 strains that can be used to make vaccines if needed.

A total of 65 confirmed human H5N1 infections have been detected in the U.S. so far this year. Most have been linked to exposure to infected cattle or poultry, and the majority have been mild. Infections have occurred in several other animals, including pet cats that may have consumed raw milk or meat from sick animals. The virus recently killed more than half of the big cats at a wildlife sanctuary in Washington State.

.

Matthias Kulka/Getty Images

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Against all expectations, Donald Trump won his second term in office. It’s a victory he can thank, in part, Gen Z men for. 

Voting data from The Wall Street Journal indicates that Trump overperformed among Generation Z, born between 1997 and 2012, compared with his marks from 2020 and made far greater gains among men than women. 

Despite what many pundits (including myself) thought, it turns out the Trump-Vance campaign’s frat-bro conservatism strategy worked, and was a big part of what won them the White House. 

Against all expectations, Donald Trump won his second term in office. It’s a victory he can thank, in part, Gen Z men for. 

Voting data from The Wall Street Journal indicates that Trump overperformed among Generation Z, born between 1997 and 2012, compared with his marks from 2020 and made far greater gains among men than women. 

Despite what many pundits (including myself) thought, it turns out the Trump-Vance campaign’s frat-bro conservatism strategy worked, and was a big part of what won them the White House. 

Between 2020 and 2024, Gen Z men shifted 15 percentage points rightward, the largest age/gender swing in this election. Women of the same age range moved 7 points in the same direction. 

Opinion:Republicans have a Gen Z problem

But it wasn’t just the shift in men that pushed Trump over. He saw spikes in minority voters, according to NBC News data.

Trump overperformed recent preelection polls, which indicated he had about a 20-point disadvantage among Gen Z, and even more of a deficit among likely Gen Z voters. 

A big part of that shift has to do with the economy, the No. 1 issue for Gen Z as a whole and one they trust Trump with more than Vice President Kamala Harris: 31% of Gen Z said the economy was their priority before the election, an issue that voters have long preferred Trump on, despite some recent tightening of the polls on the issue. 

.

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

December’s spate of drone sightings seen in New Jersey and spreading nationwide, sure looks familiar. As does its associated media frenzy—culminating in memes and conspiracy theories about so-called “mystery drones.” The episode bears an eerie resemblance to the UFO phenomenon, or the unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) one, that spiked in recent years and has led to significant congressional attention and legislation.

In a way, this is progress. The reason this outbreak looks so familiar is that such drone sightings would previously have been identified as UAP ones. It’s only after years of concerted efforts in education, and transparency by U.S. Department of Defense officials, that UAP sightings have rightfully evolved into common drone identification. That is not to say that the drone sightings are any less of a concern, but fortunately, we can address them without the contagion of the UFO community and the conspiracies associated with it.

Unfortunately, our response has been no less irrational.

A New Jersey state assemblyman has accused federal officials of “lying to us” about drones on CNN. The president-elect suggested we “shoot them down!!!” which is almost (but only almost, sadly) needless to say, a bad idea. So is wasting resources to investigate nonsensical notions of advanced technology related to Iran or, again, aliens. Calls for shooting objects down not only have obvious safety issues but fail to recall that Congress and the White House limited such strikes over U.S. territory after the incidents involving the Chinese high-altitude balloon and other balloons, based on concerns about civilian safety.

There are a couple of things we need to make clear about the drone sightings. First, many of the sightings remain mistaken interpretations of manned aircraft or satellites such as Starlink ones. The real drone sightings fall into two classes: those that are in restricted airspace, and those that are in legal airspace. Restricted airspace surrounds airports as well as national security areas such as Air Force and Navy bases. Most sightings reported fall within the latter category and have been assessed as having no immediate national security or flight safety risk, although the public finds them annoying.

One fact that many people tend to overlook, or at least don’t readily rationalize, is that these drones have lights on them. That lights are present on various flying objects including drones (also known as unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs) is a fact I often referred to in my last job, heading a Pentagon office investigating UAP sightings. Lights on a drone are for collision avoidance. They are a safety feature. Flying drones with lights ensures they can be seen; if they were meant to be unnoticed, the operators would turn off or disable the lights. In September 2023, the FAA changed the rules to allow drones to fly at night this way, and this is likely a contributing factor to the increase in sightings. The public and elected officials in Congress continue to believe lights in the sky are scary, however, particularly when they mistake crewed aircraft for drones.

Congressional officials and that unfortunate source of information, social media, continue to make unfounded claims of drone technologies far ahead of U.S. capabilities. The most recent example being the assertion that drones flew from an Iranian mother ship off the coast of the U.S. and demonstrated seven or eight hours of battery life. That fantastic assertion requires there to be evidence that the drones originated from an Iranian ship and were tracked continuously to the U.S. cities. There are no such tracks. The more rational explanation is that they originated near the place of the sighting, that is from domestic operators.

However, that doesn’t mean some drone operations aren’t ill-intentioned.

Several hypotheses (apart from mistaken identity) might explain these drones in legal airspace. They might be academic, professional or hobbyist domestic operators exploring a new technology. YouTube overflows with drone footage from amateur photographers all over the world. Flying in urban settings, in legal airspace, for photography, or maybe even some research such as high resolution thermal or pollution measurements is very plausible. Or they are commercial. Increased commercial activity is unavoidable as industry advances drone technology for delivery, remote sensing, and communications.

.

Valentyn Semenov/Alamy Stock Photo

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai told employees last week that “the stakes are high” for 2025, as the company faces increased competition and regulatory hurdles and contends with rapid advancements in artificial intelligence.

At a 2025 strategy meeting on Dec. 18, Pichai and other Google leaders, donning ugly holiday sweaters, hyped up the coming year, most notably as it pertains to what’s coming in AI, according to audio obtained by CNBC.

“I think 2025 will be critical,” Pichai said. “I think it’s really important we internalize the urgency of this moment, and need to move faster as a company. The stakes are high. These are disruptive moments. In 2025, we need to be relentlessly focused on unlocking the benefits of this technology and solve real user problems.”

Some employees attended the meeting in person at Google’s headquarters in Mountain View, California, and others tuned in virtually.

Pichai’s comments come after a year packed with some of the most intense pressure Google has experienced since going public two decades ago. While areas like search ads and cloud produced strong revenue growth, competition picked up in Google’s core markets, and the company faced internal challenges including culture clashes and concerns about Pichai’s vision for the future.

Additionally, regulation is now heavier than ever.

In August, a federal judge ruled that Google illegally holds a monopoly in the search market. The Justice Department in November asked that Google be forced to divest its Chrome internet browser unit. In a separate case, the DOJ accused the company of illegally dominating online ad technology. That trial closed in September and awaits a judge ruling.

That same month, Britain’s competition watchdog issued a statement of objections over Google’s ad tech practices, which the regulator provisionally found are impacting competition in the U.K.

“It’s not lost on me that we are facing scrutiny across the world,” Pichai said. “It comes with our size and success. It’s part of a broader trend where tech is now impacting society at scale. So more than ever, through this moment, we have to make sure we don’t get distracted.”

A Google spokesperson declined to comment.

Google’s search business still has dominant market share, but generative AI has served up all sorts of new ways for people to access online information, and has brought with it a host of new competitors.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT kicked off the hype cycle in late 2022, and investors including Microsoft have since propelled the company to a $157 billion valuation. In July, OpenAI announced it would launch a search engine of its own. Perplexity is also promoting its AI-powered search service and recently closed a $500 million funding round at a $9 billion valuation.

.

Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai gestures during a session at the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual meeting in Davos, on January 22, 2020.

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________