Home

Trump Administration Live Updates: Federal Judge Finds Third-Country Deportations Unlawful

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

  • Immigration: A federal judge in Boston on Wednesday found that the Trump administration’s policy of summarily deporting immigrants to nations other than their home countries is unlawful. The judge stayed his ruling for 15 days to allow the administration to appeal, but it was nonetheless a repudiation of an aggressive deportation policy that sent immigrants to countries where they have no ties, including Eswatini, Rwanda, and Ghana.

  • Surgeon General: Dr. Casey Means, the wellness influencer and entrepreneur nominated by President Trump for surgeon general, dodged questions on whether she believed vaccines cause autism at her Senate confirmation hearing on Wednesday. She also deflected questions about birth control, her finance,s and other topics while making the case that the country was suffering from an epidemic of chronic diseases.

  • State of the Union: Mr. Trump used much of his State of the Union address on Tuesday to berate Democrats, offering few new policy proposals while portraying the country as “winning” under his leadership. In the Democrats’ formal rebuttal, Gov. Abigail Spanberger accused Mr. Trump of lying about the economy, while other Democrats boycotted the speech.  

The third-country deportations ruling repudiates a key Homeland Security Department policy.

A federal judge in Boston on Wednesday found that the Trump administration’s policy of summarily deporting immigrants to so-called third countries — nations other than their countries of origin — is unlawful.

In an 81-page ruling, Judge Brian E. Murphy of the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts wrote that the government must first try to deport detained immigrants to their home countries — or to countries designated by an immigration judge when the immigrants were ordered removed from the country. After that process, immigration detainees must be given “meaningful notice” before being deported to another country, to allow them the opportunity to raise any fears they have that they might be persecuted or tortured there.

Senate Democrats block D.H.S. funding bill because it has no new curbs on immigration enforcement.

Senate Democrats on Tuesday blocked a spending bill to reopen the Department of Homeland Security, insisting that any such measure must include new curbs on immigration enforcement that Republicans have so far rejected.

The 50-to-45 vote all but ensured that federal funding for the department would remain halted for a second week as the stalemate between Democrats and Republicans over new restrictions on immigration agents stretches on. The legislation, which would fund the agency through September, contained modest guardrails that fell well short of Democrats’ demands. It stalled anew after failing to draw the 60 votes necessary to overcome a filibuster, with nearly all Democrats opposed, just hours before President Trump was set to address Congress. 

The nominee for surgeon general sidesteps questions about vaccines at a Senate hearing.

Dr. Casey Means, President Trump’s nominee for surgeon general, told senators on Wednesday that “anti-vaccine rhetoric has never been part of my message,” as she deflected questions about birth control, pesticides, vaccines and her finances.

Testifying before the Senate Health Committee, Dr. Means, a wellness influencer, author and leader in Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “Make America Healthy Again” movement, said Americans were suffering from an epidemic of chronic diseases linked to ultraprocessed foods, chemical exposures, and the stressed, sedentary nature of modern life.

Over more than two hours before the Senate health committee, Dr. Casey Means laid out a bleak picture of health in the United States, tying rising rates of chronic diseases to the foods Americans eat, how little we move, the medications we take and the toxic chemicals around us. While Means called for a “great national healing” during her confirmation hearing for surgeon general, she repeatedly dodged questions on vaccines, including from Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a Republican who is a doctor and a proponent of vaccines.

Means said that she believed vaccines were life-saving and important but also that parents and patients should have autonomy and rely on thorough discussions with their doctors. She also faced numerous questions about the supplements and wellness products she has previously promoted in her newsletter.

The Senate’s confirmation hearing for Dr. Casey Means, President Trump’s nominee for surgeon general, has ended. Dr. Casey Means did not answer directly when Senator Bill Cassidy, Republican of Lousiana, asked if universal hepatitis B vaccination was an important goal. She said the vaccine was life-saving but that parents should have “autonomy.” She said children should be immunized “at some point in their youth.” Cassidy, a medical doctor and liver specialist, has previously spoken out strongly in support of the vaccine.Dr. Means said she had “significant concerns” about pesticides like glyphosate, and called for them to be studied more robustly. She has previously called moving away from industrial agriculture practices that use toxic pesticides the single most important strategy for solving health and environmental issues. She has also called the use of pesticides a “slow-motion extinction event.”Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, pressed Means about past comments she had made on the hepatitis B vaccine for newborns. Means said the vaccine was “effective” and “very important,” but that parents should make a shared decision with doctors.

Democrats counter Trump after his combative State of the Union speech.

President Trump used much of his nearly two-hour State of the Union address on Tuesday night to berate and taunt Democrats, who responded by accusing the president of lying about the economy and ignoring voters’ concerns.

In his remarks, Mr. Trump introduced few new policies and instead appeared to relish the theatrics of the moment. He attacked Democrats as “crazy” for not standing for or applauding his priorities, especially on crime, immigration and the economy.

Ilhan Omar condemns arrest of her guest at State of the Union.

Representative Ilhan Omar on Wednesday condemned the arrest of a guest she brought to the State of the Union, saying that being charged with a crime for standing up in the gallery during the president’s address “sends a chilling message about the state of our democracy.”

Aliya Rahman, a U.S. citizen who was dragged from her vehicle after an ICE agent shattered its window during President Trump’s immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, attended the president’s speech on Tuesday night at the invitation of Ms. Omar. As Mr. Trump was speaking, Ms. Rahman was seen being escorted from the gallery above the House floor by Capitol Police officers. She could be heard shouting for someone to call Ms. Omar, and that all she had done was stand up.

Trump’s speech gets a mixed reaction around the world.

President Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday has prompted a variety of reactions in the global news media.

Canada’s public broadcaster called it a “relatively focused” speech by the president’s standards, with “one angry detour” about immigration. The British Broadcasting Corporation said it was “made-for-the-cameras” moment, while The Guardian deemed it Mr. Trump’s “most inconsequential” address yet. The South China Morning Post noticed he did not mention Beijing.

Representative Ilhan Omar, Democrat of Minnesota, released a statement condemning the arrest of one of her guests at last night’s State of the Union speech: Aliya Rahman, a U.S. citizen who had been dragged from her car after an ICE agent shattered her car’s window during the immigration crackdown in Minneapolis. In an interview with “Democracy Now,” Rahman said that the sergeant of arms told her she was arrested because she had stood up during the speech.

Rahman “stood up silently in the gallery during the president’s speech for a short period of time, part of which other guests were also standing,” Omar said. “For that, she was forcibly removed, despite warning officers about her injured shoulders and ultimately charged with ‘Unlawful Conduct.’”

“The heavy-handed response to a peaceful guest sends a chilling message about the state of our democracy,” Omar said, calling for a full explanation.

President Trump insulted and criticized Representatives Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, two Muslim Democrats who heckled him during his State of the Union address, suggesting in a post on Truth Social on Wednesday that that America “should send them back from where they came.”

Trump has a history of making such nativist attacks, which lawmakers have long criticized as deploying racist tropes, against both women, left-leaning lawmakers, who were the first two Muslim women ever elected to Congress. Tlaib, the daughter of Palestinian immigrants, was born in Detroit. Omar, a frequent target of the president, is from Somalia. Both are American citizens.

Seven voters react to Trump’s address.

During President Trump’s State of the Union address, many medals were given out. There was taunting of Democrats, a few of whom shouted right back.

But in a midterm election year, with his polls numbers slipping, Mr. Trump spent much of the speech trying to make the case that his second term was “a turnaround for the ages.”

Vance says Trump administration will withhold over $250 million in Medicaid funds from Minnesota.

Trump administration officials announced on Wednesday that the federal government would withhold $259 million in Medicaid funds to Minnesota, the latest effort by the federal government to pull funding from Democratic-led states as President Trump rails against a major welfare fraud scandal there.

Federal judges have blocked most of the Trump administration’s efforts to claw back funds from states like Minnesota, New York, California, Illinois and Colorado. The states have decried the cuts as politically motivated, adding that they would harm hundreds of thousands of people. The Trump administration has pointed to allegations of fraud to justify the cuts.

Patel ousts F.B.I. personnel tied to the inquiry into Trump’s retention of classified records.

About 10 F.B.I. employees, some veteran agents, were dismissed this week for their work on the investigation into President Trump’s retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, his residence in Florida, according to five people with knowledge of the move.

The firings are part of a rolling barrage of retribution aimed at those who worked on the two federal prosecutions of Mr. Trump after his first term in office. They came hours after Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, told Reuters that as part of the documents inquiry, the bureau had subpoenaed phone metadata for himself and Susie Wiles, currently the White House chief of staff.

A federal prosecutor found to be in civil contempt of court by a judge in Minnesota is now appealing that ruling, according to court filings. Matthew Isihara, a military judge advocate on temporary assignment to the Justice Department, was found in contempt by Judge Laura M. Provinzino last week after D.H.S. released an immigration detainee hundreds of miles away from home, and without his identification papers, contrary to the judge’s order. Because his papers were returned promptly by FedEx after the contempt ruling, Isihara was able to avoid a $500-a-day fine, but the legal dispute over his conduct will now continue. The notice filed Wednesday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit says Isihara is appealing “in his individual capacity,” and is signed by Daniel N. Rosen, the district’s U.S. attorney. The appeal comes as dozens of judges across the country threaten to hold administration lawyers in contempt for ignoring their orders and missing filing deadlines in cases where immigrants are challenging the legality of their detention. 

About 10 F.B.I. employees, some of them veteran agents, have been dismissed in connection with their work on the federal investigation into President Trump’s improper retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, his residence and resort in Florida, according to three people with knowledge of the matter. The dismissals came on the same day Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, told Reuters that the F.B.I. had subpoenaed phone metadata for himself and Susie Wiles, currently the White House chief of staff, when they were private citizens in 2022 and 2023 as part of the documents investigation.

Vice President JD Vance announced that the Trump administration would withhold $259 million in Medicaid funds to Minnesota, the latest effort by the federal government to pull funding from Democratic states. Federal judges have blocked most of those actions, including two pots of funds of more than $10 billion distributed by the Department of Health and Human Services.

Like the previous safety net cuts, administration officials justified the withheld funds by pointing to a major welfare fraud scandal that has rocked Minnesota. President Trump has alleged, without evidence, that similar large fraud schemes are playing out elsewhere in Minnesota and other Democratic states. The president has also, improbably, claimed that there is so much fraud that he would be able to balance the federal budget once he eliminated such waste — a mathematically impossible feat, given the amount of funding involved compared with the size of the deficit.

The Senate voted along party lines to fill the seat of an air safety official ousted by Trump.

The Senate on Wednesday voted along party lines to confirm John DeLeeuw to the National Transportation Safety Board, filling an opening that President Trump created when he fired the board’s vice chair, who is suing to get his job back.

The debate over the selection of Mr. DeLeeuw, a longtime aviator and executive for American Airlines, did not center on his qualifications. The 50-to-45 vote, in which all Republicans voted to confirm, served as more of a referendum on whether Mr. Trump has power to fire Senate-confirmed federal officials — a question being considered by the Supreme Court.

Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, said Wednesday that he would most likely force a vote next week on a measure to curb President Trump’s power to order an attack on Iran. “The president made no real case last night as to why we should be in a war with Iran,” Kaine said on Capitol Hill. “We should not send our sons and daughters into another war in the Middle East.”

Kaine conceded that the Republican majority could kill the bill, as they did with a similar resolution on Venezuela last month. But with the president ordering a build up of U.S. military force in the region, he said he intended to make sure “everybody is going to be on the record.”

President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine said he spoke with Trump over the phone on Wednesday, along with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, about the peace talks set to take place in Geneva on Thursday. Zelensky said he thanked Trump for a program that allows European allies to buy U.S. air defense missiles for Ukraine, which Trump touted during his State of the Union address on Tuesday. “This winter has been the most difficult one for Ukraine, but the missiles for air defense systems that we purchase from the U.S. are helping us get through all these challenges and protect lives,” Zelensky said in a statement. Vice President JD Vance told Fox News on Wednesday that Iran should take President Trump’s threats to use military action “seriously,” saying the president had shown a “willingness” to use force if diplomatic efforts fail to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. His comment echoed President Trump’s State of the Union address, in which he said that his “preference” was to take the path of diplomacy but did not explain why he had amassed the largest amount of military firepower in the Middle East since the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. Negotiators for both the United States and Iran are set to hold indirect talks in Geneva on the United States imposed new sanctions on Wednesday on more than 30 entities, individuals, and vessels that it said were linked to Iran’s weapons procurement networks and the shadow fleet surreptitiously transporting Iranian oil to foreign markets. The Treasury Department will continue to apply “maximum pressure on Iran to target the regime’s weapons capabilities and support for terrorism,” Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement.

President Claudia Sheinbaum of Mexico said on Wednesday that she had an eight-minute phone call with President Trump on Monday after a military operation in the state of Jalisco during which the cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as El Mencho, was killed. The kiling unleashed retaliatory violence by the cartel in several states.

She said that Trump asked what was happening in Mexico. “I told him how the operation had gone, that we had received intelligence support from the U.S. government, that the coordination was going very well, and that was it,” Sheinbaum said. This contrasts with Trump’s remarks on Tuesday night during his State of the Union address, when he appeared to take credit for the operation.

To deal with rising electric bills, Trump says tech companies will pay.

In a nod to voter frustration over rising electricity prices, President Trump on Tuesday said he was negotiating pledges from major tech companies to pay a greater share of the energy costs associated with new data centers.

Silicon Valley is spending hundreds of billions of dollars to build power-hungry data centers for artificial intelligence as demand for electricity is increasing across the United States. That has led to widespread fears that the A.I. boom could cause utility bills to spike for ordinary households.

The United States sent a group of F-22 Raptor jets to Israel on Tuesday, a U.S. official and a person familiar with the deployment said. The move continued the U.S. military buildup in the Middle East and came two days before the next round of negotiations with Iran about its nuclear program was expected.

Flight tracking data and videos show what appears to be the first known deployment of this type of aircraft, one of the most advanced U.S. fighter jets, during the escalating tensions with Iran. Videos and photos captured by plane spotters show a dozen F-22s taking off from their temporary station in Britain.

The Latest on the Trump Administration


  • State of the Union: In the longest such address in U.S. history, President Trump cast Democrats as villains and insisted he had overseen a “turnaround for the ages,” even as voters lost confidence in his handling of the economy. Gov. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia gave the Democratic rebuttal. Here are six takeaways from the night.

  • Surgeon General Nominee: Dr. Casey Means told senators in her confirmation hearing that “anti-vaccine rhetoric has never been part of my message,” as she deflected questions about birth control, pesticides, vaccines, and her finances.

  • Bureau of Land Management: An unusual coalition of hunters, veterans, and environmental activists is opposing Steve Pearce, Trump’s choice to lead the

  • bureau, citing concerns about actions he had taken as a lawmaker to try to sell public lands to private interests.

  • Mideast Military Buildup: The United States sent a group of F-22 Raptor jets to Israel, a U.S. official and a person familiar with the deployment said, a continuation buildup of forces in the region that came two days before another round of negotiations with Iran.

  • Kash Patel: The F.B.I. director’s trip to Italy — culminating in a celebratory beer swig with the U.S. hockey team at the Milan Olympics — included several hours of work meetings, a handful of meet-and-greets, hours of downtime, private meals, and “cultural activities,” according to an internal schedule obtained by The Times. The taxpayer-funded visit reignited the firestorm over use of government resources.

  • Homeland Security Funding: Senate Democrats blocked a spending bill to reopen the Department of Homeland Security, insisting that any such measure must include new curbs on immigration enforcement that Republicans have so far rejected. The vote all but ensured that federal funding for the department would remain halted for a second week.

.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2025/03/21/multimedia/live-blog-20260225-trump-news-header-1/live-blog-20260225-trump-news-header-1-jumbo-v3.jpg?quality=75&auto=webpA group of Middle Eastern and Asian migrants deported by the U.S. government at a shelter in Panama last year. Credit…Nathalia Angarita for The New York Times

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.nytimes.com

.

__________________________________________

Alzheimer’s blood tests predict what age people will be when the disease may cause symptoms, study finds

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

Blood tests that detect a protein involved in Alzheimer’s disease could help predict the age at which the disease may strike people long before they develop symptoms, according to a new study. But questions remain about the accuracy and uncertainty of these tests, and experts caution that the assays aren’t ready for prime time.

“While the results here are encouraging, they are not yet at the level of having significant clinical benefit for individual patients,” says Corey Bolton, a clinical neuropsychologist and an assistant professor of medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, who was not involved in the new study. “Alzheimer’s disease is a complex condition with numerous intersecting risk and resilience factors that vary from person to person. These factors can have a large influence in the age of symptom onset and the rate of clinical decline.”

The study included more than 600 people aged 62 to 78 who were not cognitively impaired. They had blood tests to detect a protein called p-tau217, which accumulates in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s. The researchers then used a model based on the tests to predict the age of onset of the disease in people with no cognitive impairment, with three to four years of uncertainty.

“A key innovation was estimating when they’re going to develop symptoms,” says Suzanne Schindler, an associate professor of neurology at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, who co-authored the study. The research was published on Thursday in Nature Medicine. Several of the study authors have consulted for or received funding from companies that make these Alzheimer’s blood tests. Schindler says she provides unpaid consulting to diagnostic companies.

More than seven million Americans are living with Alzheimer’s disease, and there is no cure. The neurodegenerative condition is associated with the buildup of plaques of amyloid protein and tangles of tau protein in the brain, which can develop for a decade or more before visible symptoms such as memory loss or confusion arise.

Blood tests are increasingly used to detect biological signs of the disease. They are much cheaper and easier to administer than traditional diagnostics such as spinal taps or positron-emission tomography (PET) scans. Two tests are approved for use in the U.S. in people with Alzheimer’s symptoms—Lumipulse (made by Fujirebio) and Elecsys (made by Roche Diagnostics).

But these tests may not always accurately predict who will and won’t develop Alzheimer’s, experts say. And the medical consensus is that they should not be taken by people who do not have symptoms of cognitive decline.

Detecting Alzheimer’s before symptoms show up, however, may be crucial to treating it: although there is no cure for the condition, two drugs have been approved that can slow the rate of progression in some people when the disease is caught early. And there are clinical trials of these drugs underway to determine whether treatment could head off the disease in people who have biological signs of the disease but no symptoms. The results are expected in the next few years.

In the new study, Schindler and her colleagues tested how well a blood test for p-tau217 could predict the age at which people who had the protein would develop symptoms of the disease. They found that these blood, or plasma, “clocks” could predict how likely and when people would develop symptoms of the disease. Interestingly, the older a person was, the sooner symptoms would appear.

“So, for example, if you have a positive blood test when you’re 60, it may take 20 years before you develop symptoms—versus, if you don’t have a positive blood test until you’re 80, it may take only 10 years,” Schindler says.

Of course, the tests are not foolproof. It’s important to note that the researchers are “not recommending this for people who are asymptomatic,” says Zaldy Tan, a memory and aging specialist at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. And a three- to four-year error margin on either side of diagnosis is “a big window,” he notes, especially if you’re using the knowledge to make decisions about retirement plans or finances.

“Other medical conditions, such as chronic kidney disease and obesity, seem to have a large impact on the circulating levels of these proteins and can greatly influence results, leading to false positives or false negatives,” Bolton says. This study used a type of test that limits the effect of these conditions, he says, but “there are still many unanswered questions about how these blood tests perform in diverse populations.”

Despite their limits, however, the tests are still valuable for diagnosis and planning treatment, Bolton says. People found to be at greater risk of developing the disease could still benefit from interventions such as exercise, a healthy diet and cognitive or social stimulation.

Nathaniel Chin, a geriatrician and medical director at the Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center in Madison, who was not involved in the study, is “impressed and excited” by its results. He hopes researchers will replicate the findings in other populations.

The study was funded by a public-private partnership through the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Consortium. Schindler notes that the study data are publicly available and that anyone can download and analyze them.

.

https://static.scientificamerican.com/dam/m/26cf167f94586990/original/blood-sample-in-hand.jpg?m=1771464787.266&w=900Simon Dawson/Bloomberg Creative/Getty Images

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/alzheimers-blood-tests-predict-the-average-age-at-which-the-disease-may/

.

__________________________________________

OpenAI and Google Take Steps to Avoid Abusive AI Imagery After Grok Scandal

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

2026 started with a horrifying example of generative AI’s potential for abuse. Grok, the AI tool from Elon Musk’s xAI, was used to undress or nudify pictures of people shared on X (formerly Twitter) at an alarming rate. Grok made 3 million sexualized images over a span of 11 days in January, with approximately 23,000 of those containing images of children, according to a study from the Center for Countering Digital Hate.

Now, competitors like OpenAI and Google are stepping up their security to avoid being the next Grok.

Advocates and safety researchers have long been concerned about AI’s ability to create abusive and illegal content. The creation and sharing of nonconsensual intimate imagery, sometimes referred to as revenge porn, was a big problem before AI. Generative AI only makes it quicker, easier, and cheaper for anyone to target and victimize people. 

2026 started with a horrifying example of generative AI’s potential for abuse. Grok, the AI tool from Elon Musk’s xAI, was used to undress or nudify pictures of people shared on X (formerly Twitter) at an alarming rate. Grok made 3 million sexualized images over a span of 11 days in January, with approximately 23,000 of those containing images of children, according to a study from the Center for Countering Digital Hate.

Now, competitors like OpenAI and Google are stepping up their security to avoid being the next Grok.

Advocates and safety researchers have long been concerned about AI’s ability to create abusive and illegal content. The creation and sharing of nonconsensual intimate imagery, sometimes referred to as revenge porn, was a big problem before AI. Generative AI only makes it quicker, easier, and cheaper for anyone to target and victimize people. 

On Jan. 14, two weeks into the scandal, X’s Safety account confirmed in a post that it would pause Grok’s ability to edit images on the social media app. Grok’s image-generation abilities are still available to paying subscribers in its standalone app and website. X did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Most major companies have safeguards in place to prevent the kind of wide-scale abuse that we saw was possible with Grok. But cybersecurity is never a solid metal wall of protection; it’s a brick wall that’s constantly undergoing repairs. Here’s how OpenAI and Google have tried to beef up their safety protections to circumvent Grok-like failures.

Read More: AI Slop Is Destroying the Internet. These Are the People Fighting to Save It

OpenAI fixes image generation vulnerabilities

At a base level, all AI companies have policies prohibiting the creation of illegal imagery, like child sexual abuse material, also known as CSAM. Many tech companies have guardrails to prevent the creation of intimate imagery altogether. Grok is the exception, with “spicy” modes for image and video.

Still, anyone intent on creating nonconsensual intimate imagery can try to trick AI models into doing so.

Researchers from Mindgard, a cybersecurity company focused on AI, found a vulnerability in ChatGPT that allowed people to circumvent its guardrails and make intimate images. They used a tactic called “adversarial prompting,” where testers try to poke holes in an AI with specifically crafted instructions. In this case, it was tricking the chatbot’s memory with custom prompts, then copying the nudified style onto images of well-known people.

Mindgard alerted OpenAI of its findings in early February, and the ChatGPT developer confirmed on Feb. 10 — before Mindgard went public with its report — that it had fixed the problem.

“We’re grateful to the researchers who shared their findings,” an OpenAI spokesperson said to CNET and Mindgard. “We moved quickly to fix a bug that allowed the model to generate these images. We value this kind of collaboration and remain focused on strengthening safeguards to keep users safe.”

This process is how cybersecurity often works. Outside red-team researchers like Mindgard test software for weaknesses or workarounds, mimicking strategies that bad actors might use. When they identify security gaps, they alert the software provider so fixes can be deployed.

“Assuming motivated users will not attempt to bypass safeguards is a strategic miscalculation. Attackers iterate. Guardrails must assume persistence,” Mindgard wrote in a blog post.

While tech companies boast about how you can use their AI for any purpose, they also need to make a strong promise that they can prevent AI from being used to enact abuse. For AI image generation, that means having a strong repertoire of prompts that will be refused and kicked back to users. 

When OpenAI launched its Sora 2 video model, it promised to be more conservative with its content moderation for this very reason. But it’s important to ensure its moderation practices are consistently effective, not just at a product’s launch. It makes AI safety testing an ongoing process for cybersecurity researchers and AI developers alike.

Google upgrades Search reporting

For its part, Google is taking steps to ensure abusive images aren’t spread as easily. The tech giant simplified its process for requesting the removal of explicit images from Google Search. You can click the three dots in the upper right corner of an image, click report and then tell Google you want the photo removed because it “shows a sexual image of me.” The new changes also let you select multiple images at once and track your reports more easily.

“We hope that this new removal process reduces the burden that victims of nonconsensual explicit imagery face,” the company said in a blog post.

When asked about any further steps the company is taking to prevent AI-enabled abuse, Google pointed CNET to its generative AI prohibited use policy. Google’s policy, like many other tech companies’ fine print, outlaws using AI for illegal or potentially abusive activities, such as creating intimate imagery.

.

https://www.cnet.com/a/img/resize/7fb3e6fc8a601e83d76331f28fa37cae3876fe67/hub/2026/02/23/3b3d2299-2ac7-46d5-941b-91e9cca1d6b5/ai-cybersecurity-gettyimages-2250495593.jpg?auto=webp&fit=crop&height=675&width=1200

AI safety is an ongoing challenge. ismagilov/iStock/Getty Images

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/openai-and-google-take-steps-to-avoid-abusive-ai-imagery-after-grok-scandal/

.

__________________________________________

State of the Union Live Updates: Trump Is Set to Speak at a Pivotal Moment

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

Bruised by a Supreme Court setback and falling approval ratings, the president has an opportunity to change the narrative ahead.

Here’s the latest.

President Trump, reeling from a major setback on his sweeping tariffs at the Supreme Court and facing the lowest approval ratings of his second term, will deliver his State of the Union address on Tuesday at a pivotal moment in his presidency.

He is expected to highlight what he said was a lengthy list of achievements. But polls show that Americans, by a wide margin, now disapprove of him on what were once his winning issues: the economy and immigration. Republicans are now in danger of losing the House in the upcoming midterm elections, a development that would threaten much of Mr. Trump’s second-term agenda.

Add Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, to the list of prominent Democrats who are boycotting Trump’s speech. The list so far includes some 40 lawmakers. We’re still waiting to hear where others, like Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker, land. Notably, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, is not coming. Representative Al Green, the septuagenarian Texas Democrat who last year was ejected from the chamber during Trump’s speech for shouting and waving his cane, is in the chamber with a homemade cardboard sign that says “Al Green.” His outburst last year, which Republicans eventually censured him for, was largely viewed with frustration by Democrats, who thought it was a childish form of protest.

How The Times reports on the State of the Union.

Tonight is somewhat of a political Super Bowl: President Trump will deliver his State of the Union address to the nation, a tradition that dates to 1790.

“It’s an important moment to see where the president is focused and how he is being received,” said Julie Hirschfeld Davis, The New York Times’s congressional editor, who is helping coordinate coverage of the speech.

Biden laid out the stakes of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine four years ago.

Four years ago, Russia poured over the border into Ukraine, igniting the biggest war in the heart of Europe since the end of World War II. The invasion that began on Feb. 24, 2022, shattered the notion that the world order that followed had banished the days when powerful nations simply took over their weaker neighbors.

Days later, President Joseph R. Biden Jr. laid out the stakes during a State of the Union address and received towering applause, even from Republicans who disliked him and despised his agenda. After all, vowing to support nascent democracies was still in favor in Washington, an idea that crossed party lines. 

More than a dozen Epstein victims will attend the speech as lawmakers’ invited guests.

Over a dozen lawmakers are bringing survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse to President Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday night, a statement against the administration’s handling of documents related to the convicted sex offender.

Lawmakers for many years have invited guests to the annual speech as a way of sending pointed messages to the president. A number of Democrats have said they will boycott the speech and attend a rally on the National Mall near the Capitol.

U.S. men’s hockey team arrives for the State of the Union, but the women stay away.

Fresh from winning a gold medal, members of the U.S. men’s hockey team arrived at the White House on Tuesday afternoon, two days after President Trump invited them to visit the residence and then attend his State of the Union speech on Capitol Hill.

The president had excitedly extended the invitation on Sunday by speakerphone, when he placed a call to the equally jazzed F.B.I. director, Kash Patel. Mr. Patel was at the Winter Olympics in Italy, celebrating and spraying beer in the locker room with the men’s team.

More than a dozen Epstein victims will attend the speech as lawmakers’ invited guests.

Over a dozen lawmakers are bringing survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse to President Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday night, a statement against the administration’s handling of documents related to the convicted sex offender.

Lawmakers for many years have invited guests to the annual speech as a way of sending pointed messages to the president. A number of Democrats have said they will boycott the speech and attend a rally on the National Mall near the Capitol.

U.S. men’s hockey team arrives for the State of the Union, but the women stay away.

Fresh from winning a gold medal, members of the U.S. men’s hockey team arrived at the White House on Tuesday afternoon, two days after President Trump invited them to visit the residence and then attend his State of the Union speech on Capitol Hill.

The president had excitedly extended the invitation on Sunday by speakerphone, when he placed a call to the equally jazzed F.B.I. director, Kash Patel. Mr. Patel was at the Winter Olympics in Italy, celebrating and spraying beer in the locker room with the men’s team.

.

The Capitol

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.nytimes.com

.

__________________________________________

How does type 1 diabetes actually work?

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

Have you ever thought about how your body turns food into energy? Or just how carefully it has to manage that process?

When we eat, the glucose from our food gets stored in the liver as glycogen. And based on our body’s needs, the liver will convert that glycogen back into glucose so that it can travel through the blood and get to our cells, which turn that glucose into energy.

Meanwhile, our pancreas produces a hormone called insulin whose job is to go into the blood and tell our cells to take in that glucose. That also makes insulin a regulator of our body’s blood sugar levels, preventing the complications that can happen when our levels are too high or too low.

When the pancreas stops producing insulin, glucose doesn’t enter our cells. Instead, it accumulates in the bloodstream. In some people, the pancreas stops making insulin altogether. This condition is known as type 1 diabetes.

While the exact cause is mysterious, we know the disease happens because immune cells target and attack insulin-producing cells in the pancreas called beta cells. As those cells get destroyed, the body stops producing insulin and loses the key regulator of blood sugar levels. That in turn can drive a number of symptoms, including fatigue and weakness.

Over the 20th and 21st centuries, scientists have developed technologies that have made type 1 diabetes treatable. These include meters to check blood glucose levels and pumps that give small doses of insulin. And with advances in construction and software, these tools have become smaller and more portable. Despite these advances, scientists are still pursuing a cure for type 1 diabetes.

.

Watch on YouTube

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

3 Steps to watch the YouTube Video above:

1 . Click the link below, 2 . Click ‘How does type 1 diabetes actually work’, 3 . click play button.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/video/how-does-type-1-diabetes-actually-work/

.

__________________________________________

Are You Making These 3 Savings Mistakes?

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

Saving money is an essential personal finance habit you want to build the right way. Having a healthy savings base achieves several things: It lessens your reliance on debt if an unexpected bill arises. And, it can help you build the discipline necessary to achieve your goals.

When used well, saving money can help you build a healthy financial foundation. However, there are also common mistakes you want to avoid.

Avoiding these mistakes ensures you’re maximizing your gains and not leaving money on the table. Here’s a look at some of the most common oopsies and ways to avoid them.

I used to have a brick-and-mortar bank, and I loved the customer service. Every time I walked in, I felt like I was on an episode of Cheers. Yet, a harsh reality hit every month when I received my statement. I was only earning pennies.

That wasn’t going to build momentum. So, I switched to a high-yield savings account with an online bank. I earn an APY that helps me reach my goals quicker.

Here’s a comparison: If I deposit $10,000 into a Chase savings account earning 0.01% APY for a year, I’m earning a dime. That’s not optimal. However, by switching to Newtek Bank, I earn an APY of 4.20% APY. Over the course of the year, I’m earning $428.92. That’s over a $400 difference in one year. And that will grow incrementally the longer I save.

Therefore, if you’re keeping your money in a low-interest account, it pays to shop around. Use this Bankrate tool to find the best high-yield savings accounts for you:

Now, the thing about these savings accounts is that they come with variable interest rates. It means they could change at any time due to Federal Reserve or bank policy. So make sure to pay close attention to rates on occasion, and if they dip, use this tool to help you find a better option.

Along with being proactive about shopping around for savings rates, there’s another critical factor you’ll need to consider.

Placing too much money in a savings account

The smart rule of thumb is to save at least six months of living expenses in an emergency fund. That way, if you experience a job loss or a surprise medical diagnosis, you can cover your bills without relying on debt.

To determine your emergency fund, add up all your essential monthly expenses, such as mortgage payments, debts, utilities, prescriptions, and household items. Once you have that total, set a savings goal to reach this amount using a high-yield savings account.

After you reach that goal, you’ll want to adjust your strategy aside from other short-term savings goals you might have. Why? Savings can help build a healthy financial foundation, but investing builds wealth. Say you have an extra $40,000 you keep in a high-yield savings account for 20 years instead of investing it and earning an average annual return of around 8%.

The difference between these strategies is significant—almost $70,000. Remember that savings protect wealth, but investing builds it. You’ll need both to achieve your long-term goals, so adjust accordingly once you reach your emergency target and short-term goals. And speaking of goals…

Not saving with a purpose

Many people save because they know it’s necessary, but there’s no direction beyond that intention. This can be problematic as aimless saving could lead to aimless spending. When you don’t have a clear objective, that money can appear as “extra” cash, making it easier to justify impulse purchases.

Meanwhile, saving with a purpose means creating “sinking funds” for an expressed purpose. By assigning every dollar a job in your savings plan, you create a mental barrier against spending it.

Think of it this way: If you’re earmarking money for a dream vacation in a year, you’re less likely to splurge on an impulse purchase because you have a bigger goal in mind. Having a target keeps you focused, so a higher reward awaits you in the future.

Which savings account is right for your goals? Here’s a guide that can help:

Goal Category Example Goals Recommended Account Type
Emergency Fund Job loss, unexpected medical bills, car repairs, home maintenance High-yield savings account (HYSA)
Short-Term Goals (0-2 years) Vacation, new appliance purchase, holiday gifts HYSA or a certificate of deposit
Mid-Term Goals (2-5 years) Down payment on a house, major home renovation, or starting a small business fund HYSA, short-term investment account (e.g., brokerage account with low-risk funds), or CD ladder (which is where you open several CDs at differing times and lengths to optimize cash flow)
Long-Term Goals (5+ years) Retirement, child’s college education, building significant wealth Tax-advantaged investment accounts (e.g., 401(k), IRA, 529 Plan), brokerage account
Specific Needs Upcoming large tax payment, insurance deductible coverage HYSA or a money market account (MMA) that works like a savings account with debit card privileges

Develop smart habits that benefit your future

Saving money is a smart first step towards building good financial habits. Recognizing and avoiding these savings mistakes can put you on the right path to maximizing your earnings and properly allocating them to reach your short-term and long-term goals.

.

(Mistake) Sitting your money in a low APY account

a slowly dissolving one hundred dollar bill(Image credit: Getty Images)

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.kiplinger.com/personal-finance/how-to-save-money/are-you-making-these-savings-mistakes

.

__________________________________________

Ukraine Has Passed a Point of No Return

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

Many Ukrainians — even those born after the country gained independence from Moscow’s rule in 1991 — grew up with much of the same mythology of the Great Patriotic War. Ukraine, which was under German occupation for most of that war, lost some 10 million people. Mila’s surviving grandparents, like mine, celebrated every anniversary of that war’s end but almost never talked about what they had experienced. After the war, the Soviet authorities sent thousands of Ukrainians to the gulag for suspected collaboration with the Germans — in many cases, as what amounted to punishment for surviving the occupation. Ukrainians never forgot that injury. Both of those World War II stories — of the heroism of Ukrainians and of the cruelty of Moscow — inform the way Ukrainians think about the war they are fighting now.

Newer works of history reframe the period as two sides of a coin: German and Soviet occupations of Ukraine, two empires that aimed to enslave Ukrainians — Germany during World War II, the Soviet Union before and after. And yet, the number four has continued to loom large in collective memory. Now Ukraine’s patriotic war, against Russia, has crossed that threshold, with no end in sight. Russia’s offensive appeared to speed up in December. In February, Ukraine recaptured ground, in its most successful counteroffensive in more than two years. But on the whole, the front line has remained largely static for more than three years. Russia’s apparently overwhelming superiority in manpower and military resources didn’t bring about a swift victory, but neither have the resolve of the Ukrainian people and the Western aid they have received proved enough to stop Russia’s aggression.

Whatever lies ahead feels as if it will last forever. Ukrainians have organized their lives accordingly. They are living this war in their work, their social lives, their waking and sleeping hours. It is a fundamental orientation of time, values and social relations that will define many future generations of Ukrainian life.

By any measure, Ukraine is a profoundly different country now than it was four years ago. At the start of the full-scale invasion, excluding regions that were already occupied by Russia, it had a population of perhaps 36 million people, according to Tymofii Brik, a sociologist and the rector of the Kyiv School of Economics. (Other estimates tend to be higher.) Since then, Brik says, six million have been displaced inside the country and some four million — mostly women and children — have left Ukraine. More than 100,000 Ukrainians, troops and civilians, are estimated to have been killed. Millions of people live under occupation in areas Russia controls.

When people were fleeing the Russian offensive in the winter of 2022, squeezing onto overcrowded train cars headed west, few imagined that the war would go on for a long time. Either Russia’s tremendous military might or the West’s firm resolve would dictate a fast resolution, it seemed. But four years after that — and 13 months into the presidency of Donald Trump, who promised to bring the war to an end within 24 hours of his inauguration — there is no safe home for Ukrainian war refugees to return to. And there is less and less reason even to think about it: The people who stayed in Western Europe have adapted to their new homes, and to the separation from those they left behind.

“What kind of relationship can we have, with them over there and me back here?” Taras Viazovchenko said when I asked him about the state of his marriage. He got his wife and two children out of Irpin, one of the Kyiv suburbs, then under Russian occupation, on March 3, 2022. The wife and kids live in Switzerland now. He has visited once. “She’s built a life there,” he said. “The kids speak French to each other, and I don’t understand.”

Like many Ukrainians who remained in the country, Viazovchenko has lived several different lives in the past four years — lives that he has shared with his parents and some of his friends, but not with his wife and kids. Before the full-scale invasion, Viazovchenko was a yoga instructor and a member of the Irpin City Council, a position he still holds. During the weeks in 2022 when part of Irpin was occupied, he spent every day helping people escape the town. When Russian troops retreated from the Kyiv region, Viazovchenko joined the effort to identify the bodies of people killed in Irpin and neighboring Bucha, which has become synonymous with Russian war crimes.

People killed during the occupation had been buried in private yards, in group graves, in town parks, often after their bodies were left for days wherever the killing had occurred. Viazovchenko and others exhumed the bodies, interviewed loved ones and witnesses, and tried to match remains to descriptions. After several months of this work, Viazovchenko became obsessed. He and his colleagues had been able to identify more than 400 bodies, but several dozen remained. Viazovchenko couldn’t sleep. He couldn’t think of anything else. He kept unzipping the black bags in which the bodies were kept — or what remained of them after several months in morgues that didn’t consistently have electricity.

It took the intervention of visiting mental health professionals for Viazovchenko to get help. He worked on setting up therapy centers for survivors of Russian aggression in different parts of Ukraine. And then last year, at the age of 46, he enlisted. He thinks that everyone should.

To be clear, not everyone agrees. After an initial wave of volunteers immediately after the full-scale invasion, the Ukrainian armed forces have struggled to conscript enough people. People who enlisted four years ago and who are still physically able to serve have been unable to leave the service. Meanwhile, enlistment officers stage daily raids in Ukrainian cities, apprehending potential conscripts and delivering them to military bases. Some escape. At the same time, on this visit in particular, I heard many stories of people who either chose to enlist or submitted to a conscription raid and found peace in the service — and in no longer trying to evade it. Viazovchenko thinks this is as it should be, and that those who cannot serve at the front should join the war effort in the rear. He complained that, after several years of pooling money for the war effort, parents’ groups have resumed collections for gifts and flowers for teachers. That strikes him as frivolous, as does any pretense of peacetime life. As an example of proper, realistic adjustment, he cited the schools of Kharkiv, many of which have permanently moved to underground bunkers.

Underground schools have become symbols of Ukrainian unbreakability, along with warming tents set up in the shadow of unheated high rises. I visited the Kyiv School of Economics, a small, ambitious private university that has managed to draw some outstanding academic talent from both Ukraine and the West. Brik, the rector, excitedly led me to the basement, where the university has created several classrooms, complete with whiteboards. The school schedules only as many classes as can simultaneously convene in the bunker, so that whenever the air-raid alarm sounds, as it does on most days, classes can move down below. Then Brik showed me something else he was proud of: a classroom equipped for a vocational training program, this one in soldering — a skill newly in demand in the growing drone industry.

.

Ms. Tereshkova is a Ukrainian photographer and filmmaker based in Berlin.

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article (sound on to listen):

https://www.nytimes.com

.

__________________________________________

Scientists may have just solved one of the strangest mysteries of Greenland’s ice sheet

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

Below the surface, Greenland’s ice appears to be churning up, a process one scientist described as akin to a “boiling pot of pasta”

Hidden underneath the surface of Greenland’s ice, there are strange, vast structures known as “plumes.” But for years, scientists didn’t know how these curious forms came to be—until now. A new study published in the journal Cryosphere reveals that the structures may have been caused by thermal convection in a process similar to the churning of the hot rock in Earth’s mantle.

Convection is caused by temperature differences within a material. Hot material rises, and cool material falls—driving a cycling, or convection. The same phenomenon appears to occur in ice, too, indicating that parts of the ice sheet may be softer than scientists realized. That’s important for one crucial reason: we know that Greenland’s ice sheet is rapidly melting. And as the climate warms, scientists are racing to understand how exactly it will melt and how fast.

“We typically think of ice as a solid material, so the discovery that parts of the Greenland ice sheet actually undergo thermal convection, resembling a boiling pot of pasta, is as wild as it is fascinating,” said Andreas Born, a professor of Earth science at the University of Bergen in Norway, in a statement.

Although the findings do not necessarily mean that the ice sheet will melt faster, they could offer clues as to how it may melt. And that knowledge is critical—the sheet is more than 650,000 square miles in size; by one estimate, if all of it melts, it will raise the planet’s sea levels by a whopping 24 feet.

“Our discovery could be key to reducing uncertainties in models of future ice sheet mass balance and sea-level rise,” Born said in the same statement.

.

https://static.scientificamerican.com/dam/m/c35ecd3da55a3ec2/original/greenland.jpg?m=1771365479.499&w=900ODD ANDERSEN/Getty Images

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-may-have-just-solved-one-of-the-strangest-mysteries-of-greenlands/

.

__________________________________________

Mexico’s most-wanted drug leader killed in military operation as clashes erupt and US tourists told to shelter in place

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

 

Nemesio “El Mencho” Oseguera Cervantes, the powerful and long-pursued head of the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and one of the world’s most-wanted traffickers, died following a Mexican military operation on Sunday, handing the country a consequential victory as it looks to show tangible results to the Trump administration.

Oseguera, a former police officer, led the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, or CJNG, as it became one of the “most powerful and ruthless criminal organizations” inside Mexico, according to the US Drug Enforcement Administration.

Violence erupted in several states in Mexico after security forces from multiple federal branches of Mexico’s military carried out the operation in the town of Tapalpa in the western state of Jalisco. Officials said suspected members of organized crime unleashed a wave of violence following the operation, torching buses and businesses while clashing with security forces.

The US State Department urged American nationals in parts of Mexico to “seek shelter and remain in residences or hotels” until further notice.

Mexico’s Secretariat of National Defense said that US authorities provided “complementary information” that supported the operation. A US defense official confirmed that an interagency US task force “played a role” in the operation. However, the precise role that the US played is still unclear.

Since its establishment in January, the Joint Interagency Task Force-Counter Cartel has regularly worked with the Mexican military through US Northern Command to combat cartel operations along the US-Mexico border, the US official said.

“However, I want to emphasize that this was a (Mexican military) operation, so the success is theirs,” the official noted.

During the raid, CJNG members traded fire with the government forces, resulting in four gang members being killed at the scene, the defense ministry said.

Osegeura and two others were seriously injured and died as they were being transported via aircraft to Mexico City, according to the ministry.

Three Mexican military personnel were also injured in the operation and transferred to a hospital in Mexico City for treatment.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum lauded the work of the agencies involved in the mission.

Mexico’s various state governments are working in “full coordination” to address the disorder, Sheinbaum said on Sunday, adding that “activities are proceeding normally” in most of the country.

“We work every day for the peace, security, justice, and well-being of Mexico,” she said.

Flights canceled as chaos erupts across Mexico

The military operation triggered a series of violent events across the state of Jalisco, which is scheduled to host four matches of the 2026 soccer World Cup in June, before spreading to other states such as Michoacán and Guanajuato.

Suspected members of organized crime groups set buses on fire, blocked roads in the area, and clashed with authorities, Jalisco Governor Pablo Lemus Navarro reported.

Video obtained by CNN showed multiple fires burning and plumes of smoke rising across Puerto Vallarta, a resort town popular with US tourists on Mexico’s west coast.

 Violence erupted in several states in Mexico after security forces from multiple federal branches of Mexico’s military carried out the operation in the town of Tapalpa in the western state of Jalisco. Officials said suspected members of organized crime unleashed a wave of violence following the operation, torching buses and businesses while clashing with security forces.

The US State Department urged American nationals in parts of Mexico to “seek shelter and remain in residences or hotels” until further notice.

Mexico’s Secretariat of National Defense said that US authorities provided “complementary information” that supported the operation. A US defense official confirmed that an interagency US task force “played a role” in the operation. However, the precise role that the US played is still unclear.

Since its establishment in January, the Joint Interagency Task Force-Counter Cartel has regularly worked with the Mexican military through US Northern Command to combat cartel operations along the US-Mexico border, the US official said.

“However, I want to emphasize that this was a (Mexican military) operation, so the success is theirs,” the official noted.

During the raid, CJNG members traded fire with the government forces, resulting in four gang members being killed at the scene, the defense ministry said.

Osegeura and two others were seriously injured and died as they were being transported via aircraft to Mexico City, according to the ministry.

Three Mexican military personnel were also injured in the operation and transferred to a hospital in Mexico City for treatment.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum lauded the work of the agencies involved in the mission.

Mexico’s various state governments are working in “full coordination” to address the disorder, Sheinbaum said on Sunday, adding that “activities are proceeding normally” in most of the country.

“We work every day for the peace, security, justice, and well-being of Mexico,” she said.

As a result of the violence, several airlines, including Delta Air Lines, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines and Air Canada, cancelled flights to Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara, leaving some tourists temporarily stranded.

Footage captured at major airports and verified by CNN showed distant smoke and panicked travelers.

At Guadalajara’s international airport, travelers took cover near a jetway and sprinted through the terminal.

Another video showed a large group of people being escorted by uniformed employees across the tarmac of Puerto Vallarta’s main airport.

Amid the flight cancellations, Mexico’s Federal Civil Aviation Agency reported that the airports of Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta and Tepic had resumed normal operations on Sunday afternoon.

During the military operation, Lemus urged residents to remain in their homes and said that public transportation services in Jalisco would be suspended “until the situation is under control.”

The governor stated that the violence has spread to at least five states and urged the public to avoid traveling on highways.

The Michoacán Public Security Secretariat reported that efforts are underway to restore traffic flow following the road blockades.

Meanwhile, the Guanajuato Security and Peace Secretariat reported fires at pharmacies and convenience stores in different parts of the state.

“No injuries have been reported, but there has been property damage,” the statement added, announcing the deployment of a security operation in coordination with the Army, the National Guard, and municipal police.

Carlos Navarro, 54, a US-Mexico dual citizen, was traveling to visit family in a small town in his home state of Jalisco as the operation unfolded.

While waiting for a connecting bus in Guadalajara, he was informed that the service was canceled due to a bus being set on fire.

Navarro took refuge in a nearby Walmart, where panicked employees permitted him to stay even as an evacuation was underway.

“You hear about it, but it’s very different to hear it on the news than to experience it firsthand,” he told CNN, “It’s very difficult because it makes you very sad. It makes you very sad because I love my country.”

Most-wanted person in Mexico

Oseguera worked for CJNG as it splintered off from the Milenio Cartel, eventually rising through the ranks to lead the criminal enterprise.

Under his leadership, CJNG expanded its power and control in Jalisco and the surrounding area.

Mexican authorities long sought to apprehend Oseguera for his involvement in the cartel. In 2018, Mexico’s Attorney General’s Office offered 30 million pesos ($1.7 million USD) for information leading to his arrest.

Oseguera was also wanted by US authorities, who offered a bounty of up to $15 million for information leading to his arrest.

The US Justice Department charged Oseguera in 2022 with leading the effort to manufacture and distribute fentanyl for importation into the US.

A Justice Department indictment of Oseguera said his organization is active in the Mexican states of Jalisco, Colima, and Veracruz, and has a presence elsewhere.

In 2025, Oseguera was sanctioned and classified as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist by the US Department of State.

In a post on X, Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau described Oseguera’s death as a “great development for Mexico, the US, Latin America, and the world.”

He added that he is watching the chaotic scenes in Mexico “with great sadness and concern.”

Pressure from Trump

Sheinbaum has previously cast doubt on the strategy of targeting cartel kingpins, warning that decapitating criminal organizations can fracture them into rival factions and ignite new cycles of violence. Yet security remains a persistent vulnerability for her administration.

Over the past year, Sheinbaum has come under intensifying pressure from US President Donald Trump, as he threatens military intervention and higher import tariffs if Mexico fails to demonstrate concrete gains in curbing drug trafficking.

Shortly after the US capture of ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro, Trump suggested that he could expand his military campaign to Mexican drug trafficking groups.

Sheinbaum has rejected the notion of US strikes in Mexico, characterizing them as a violation of Mexico’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Instead, she has pursued a direct approach to combating organized crime by increasing cooperation with US security partners.

.

Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge, Getty Images

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/22/americas/mexico-kill-drug-mencho-latam-intl

.

__________________________________________

Is This the Most Important Supreme Court Case of the Century?

Leave a comment

Click the link below the picture

.

The Supreme Court may have just helped save the Republic.

On Friday, a 6-3 majority struck down President Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to implement sweeping global tariffs, including tariffs against Mexico, Canada and China.

Justices John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett and Neil Gorsuch voted together — though for different reasons — to block one of the central elements of Trump’s foreign and economic policy. As Roberts explained in his opinion, in terms of sheer economic impact the case dwarfed many of the most contentious cases of the last several terms, including, for example, Biden v. Nebraska, the case blocking President Joe Biden’s student loan debt forgiveness program.

In fact, it may prove to be the most important Supreme Court decision this century. And if you think I’m being hyperbolic, let me explain.

First, the court blocked a monumental presidential power grab — one so big and so bold that it threatened the foundation of our constitutional system.

The chief justice’s opinion hinged on a legal principle called the “major questions doctrine” — the same doctrine that was used repeatedly to block the Biden administration’s regulations and orders.

As Justice Gorsuch explained in his concurring opinion, the doctrine means, “When executive branch officials claim Congress has granted them an extraordinary power, they must identify clear statutory authority for it.”

In other words, relying on broad and vague statutory language, such as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act’s grant of authority to presidents to “regulate” importation when he or she declares an emergency isn’t precise enough to sweep away the Constitution’s explicit language granting taxing authority to Congress.

Other justices, including Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson, had an even simpler explanation for blocking the tariffs. As Kagan wrote in her concurring opinion, “Ordinary principles of statutory interpretation lead to the same result.”

It’s not that words like “regulate” and “importation” aren’t precise enough to grant the president extraordinary powers. Instead, as Kagan wrote, “IEEPA’s key phrase — the one the government relies on — says nothing about imposing tariffs or taxes.”

And since the statute says nothing about tariffs or taxes, then the Trump administration can’t use it to prop up the president’s lawless scheme.

The majority’s reasoning alone makes the tariff case extraordinarily important.

For years presidents of both parties have been using broad and vague language in federal statutes as a pretext for engaging in lawmaking in place of Congress.

The expansion of presidential power, which has accelerated exponentially under Trump, has placed our republican form of government under strain. When presidents yank power from Congress, they begin to assume the role of an elected monarch — the exact opposite of the framers’ intent.

Gorsuch explained this masterfully in his concurrence. “For those who think it important for the nation to impose more tariffs,” he wrote, “I understand that today’s decision will be disappointing. All I can offer them is that most major decisions affecting the rights and responsibilities of the American people (including the duty to pay taxes and tariffs) are funneled through the legislative process for a reason.”

The legislative process can be slow and frustrating, Gorsuch explained, but

through that process, the nation can tap the combined wisdom of the people’s elected representatives, not just that of one faction or man. There, deliberation tempers impulse, and compromise hammers disagreements into workable solutions. And because laws must earn such broad support to survive the legislative process, they tend to endure, allowing ordinary people to plan their lives in ways they cannot when the rules shift from day to day.

In a series of interim decisions, the Trump administration recently enjoyed a temporary winning streak at the Supreme Court, but the judicial tide seems to be turning. Combined with its recent decision in Trump v. Illinois, which refused to stay a lower-court ruling blocking Trump’s deployment of the National Guard in Illinois, the Supreme Court has defied two of the administration’s most dangerous, most authoritarian ambitions.

It also appears set to defy Trump yet again in another ruling soon. In oral arguments in Trump v. Cook — a case challenging the president’s decision to fire Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve’s board of governors — a clear majority of the court seemed skeptical of his actions.

The court will also hear arguments in Trump v. Barbara — the case challenging Trump’s executive order abolishing birthright citizenship as we know it — in April, and the omens are not good for him in that case, either.

Perhaps the most important aspect of the court’s decision is how it may help restore faith in how courts make decisions. The crisis in American democracy isn’t simply a product of the Trump administration’s overreach, it’s also a product of deep public cynicism about government institutions. Trump owes at least some of his appeal to that cynicism. If all that matters is power, then why not pick the man who exercises that power to its fullest?

As a result, millions of Americans wonder, do principles matter at all? Or is all of politics merely a matter of gaining and wielding power, supporting your friends and crushing your enemies?

The tariff decision is a reminder that principles do still matter, that at least one branch of government is not in thrall to the president, and that we can rely on reason and precedent to decide cases rather than simply counting Republican and Democratic appointees.

It is important that Roberts anchored his majority opinion in three cases that struck down the policies of Democratic presidents — Biden v. Nebraska, West Virginia v. EPA (involving environmental regulations), and National Federation of Independent Business v. OSHA (Covid vaccine mandate). That sent a clear signal that presidents of both parties are held to the same standard.

And when you combine the tariff case with Trump v. Illinois, alongside the Trump administration’s terrible record at the Supreme Court during his first term (where he had the worst record of any president at least since Franklin D. Roosevelt), it’s clear that the conservative-dominated judiciary bears little resemblance to the sycophantic Republican Congress.

That doesn’t mean the court has gotten everything right. I still have profound disagreements with its decision to grant expansive presidential immunity in Trump v. United States. That case remains dangerously wrong. I also have qualms about its applications of the unitary executive theory, but the measure of a functioning branch of government isn’t whether I always agree with its decisions (and we should all be thankful for that).

Instead, I measure judicial integrity differently. I ask whether judges are acting in good faith, honestly applying their legal philosophies to the questions before them, regardless of their partisan or ideological affiliation.

There’s also a third, less obvious way in which the court’s decision helps preserve the Republic — by limiting opportunities for corruption.

By assuming vast powers of taxation, Trump made himself the focal point for an enormous amount of lobbying and trading favors. In January, for example, Politico reported that the 20 largest lobbying firms raked in nearly $824 million in revenue in the first year of Trump’s second term, a sharp increase from $595 million in Biden’s last year.

The administration has sent a message, loudly and clearly — almost anything is for sale, at the right price. And as ProPublica reported last April, politically connected people and companies were already benefiting from what appears to be targeted relief from Trump’s tariffs.

The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board called the administration’s opaque process for granting exemptions “the Beltway Swamp’s dream.”

The case is a victory for the Constitution and the rule of law, but there are still causes for concern. Trump is furious. He said he was “ashamed of certain members of the court” and said they were “very unpatriotic and disloyal to our Constitution.”

Those are dangerous words from a dangerous man.

There were also dissents, of course. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote one, as did Justice Clarence Thomas. Kavanaugh wrote the principal dissent, which both Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito joined, and his argument was straightforward. When the statute granted Congress the power to regulate importation, the word “regulate” encompasses the power to tariff. “Like quotas and embargoes,” Kavanaugh wrote, “tariffs are a traditional and common tool to regulate importation.”

The most notable portion of his dissent came later in his opinion, when he accurately noted that “numerous” other statutes grant the president the authority to impose tariffs.

Kavanaugh is correct. Other statutes do grant tariff authorizations to the president, and we should expect the administration to try to reconstruct as much of his tariff authority as he can through different means. (Biden did much the same thing in response to the Supreme Court’s student loan decision.)

But Trump’s most powerful tool has been taken away. He’ll have trouble doing tariffs the hard way when he loses the easy way. This is not an administration that is known for its legal competence.

In addition, as Roberts notes in his opinion, those other statutes “contain various combinations of procedural prerequisites, required agency determinations and limits on the duration, amount and scope of the tariffs they authorize.”

Now the ball is on Trump’s side of the net. The court has challenged him on perhaps the signature economic policy of his second term, and he is not taking it well. The threat of Trump defying the Supreme Court hovers over every decision he doesn’t like. On Friday he announced that he would impose a new 10 percent tariff on imports through different legal authorities — a move that will no doubt also be contested in court. Then on Saturday he upped it to 15 percent.

During Trump’s second term, I’ve likened the judiciary to the rear guard of a retreating army. A valiant delaying action can give the army a chance to reinforce, reorganize and strike back. But if the army can’t strike back, then rear guards merely delay defeat.

The judiciary isn’t perfect, but it is performing its core constitutional function. It is preserving the foundation of America’s constitutional structure. But not even the Supreme Court can save Americans from themselves.

If we keep electing men like Trump, they will keep undermining that foundation, until it finally collapses.

One day that may well happen. But on Friday, the Supreme Court said not this day. On this day the presidency is stuffed back into its box. On this day the separation of powers prevails. And on this day the Constitution holds.

It is now our job to make sure that the Supreme Court did not stand in vain.

.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2026/02/22/multimedia/22french-ptzg/22french-ptzg-superJumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webpJonno Rattman for The New York Times

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

https://www.nytimes.com

.

__________________________________________

Older Entries Newer Entries

Heart of Loia `'.,°~

so looking to the sky ¡ will sing and from my heart to YOU ¡ bring...

Michael Ciullo

CEO and Founder of Nsight Health

MRS. T’S CORNER

https://www.tangietwoods

Nelson MCBS

Catholic News, Prayers, HD Images, Rosary, Music, Videos, Holy Mass, Homily, Saints, Lyrics, Novenas, Retreats, Talks, Devotionals and Many More

Global geopolitics

Decoding Power. Defying Narratives.

Talk Photo

A creative collaboration introducing the art of nature and nature's art.

Movie Burner Entertainment

The Home Of Entertainment News, Reviews and Reactions

Le Notti di Agarthi

Hollow Earth Society

C r i s t i a n a' s Fine Arts ⛄️

•Whenever you are confronted with an opponent, conquer him with love.(Gandhi)

TradingClubsMan

Algotrader at TRADING-CLUBS.COM

Comedy FESTIVAL

Film and Writing Festival for Comedy. Showcasing best of comedy short films at the FEEDBACK Film Festival. Plus, showcasing best of comedy novels, short stories, poems, screenplays (TV, short, feature) at the festival performed by professional actors.

Bonnywood Manor

Peace. Tranquility. Insanity.

Warum ich Rad fahre

Take a ride on the wild side

Madame-Radio

Découvre des musiques prometteuses (principalement) dans la sphère musicale française.

Ir de Compras Online

No tiene que Ser una Pesadilla.

Kana's Chronicles

Life in Kana-text (er... CONtext)

Cross-Border Currents

Tracking money, power, and meaning across borders.

Jam Writes

Where feelings meet metaphors and make questionable choices.

emotionalpeace

Finding hope and peace through writing, art, photography, and faith in Jesus.

WearingTwoGowns.COM

The Community for Wounded Healers: Former Medical Students, Disabled Nurses, and Faith-Fueled Pivots

...

love each other like you're the lyric to their music

Luca nel laboratorio di Dexter

Comprendere il mondo per cambiarlo.

Tales from a Mid-Lifer

Mid-Life Ponderings

Creative

Travel,Tourism, Life style "Now in hundreds of languages for you."

freedomdailywriting

I speak the honest truth. I share my honest opinions. I share my thoughts. A platform to grow and get surprised.

The Green Stars Project

User-generated ratings for ethical consumerism

Cherryl's Blog

Travel and Lifestyle Blog

Sogni e poesie di una donna qualunque

Questo è un piccolo angolo di poesie, canzoni, immagini, video che raccontano le nostre emozioni

My Awesome Blog

“Log your journey to success.” “Where goals turn into progress.”

pierobarbato.com

scrivo per dare forma ai silenzi e anima alle storie che il mondo dimentica.

Thinkbigwithbukonla

“Dream deeper. Believe bolder. Live transformed.”

Vichar Darshanam

Vichar, Motivation, Kadwi Baat ( विचार दर्शनम्)

Komfort bad heizung

Traum zur Realität

Chic Bites and Flights

Savor. Style. See the world.

ومضات في تطوير الذات

معا نحو النجاح

Broker True Ratings

Best Forex Broker Ratings & Reviews

Blog by ThE NoThInG DrOnEs

art, writing and music by James McFarlane and other musicians

fauxcroft

living life in conscious reality

Srikanth’s poetry

Freelance poetry writing

JupiterPlanet

Peace 🕊️ | Spiritual 🌠 | 📚 Non-fiction | Motivation🔥 | Self-Love💕

Sehnsuchtsbummler

Reiseberichte & Naturfotografie