James' World 2

Click the link below the picture

.

The strawberry full moon in Capricorn rises on June 29 at 7:56 p.m. Eastern Time. Notably, the moon signifies when the fruit is in bloom, conveying virtue and the richness in life. It is a lunation of reflection and sympathy that gives us the opportunity to foster love and nurture our spirits.

As the first full moon of the summer, and the last full micromoon of the year, it marks a period when practicality clashes with passion, and impulsivity juxtaposes with caution. The strawberry moon aspects Neptune in Aries, a planet known to be extremely tender, but also deceptive. We will be challenging structures we’ve previously built, and trying to comprehend what is tangible and real versus what is based on our illusions.

In true Capricorn fashion, we must give our all to what speaks to our hearts. Fernando Salinas, author of The Joy of Tarot, says, “This full moon is all about recognizing that there is a magic to discipline, and that you have to be diligent if you’re going to get the gold medal in the end. I want for you to manifest something huge, something big—think of the mountain the goat of Capricorn has to climb—and then I want you to take one big step towards accomplishing it.”Approximately six and a half hours before the full moon occurs, Mercury also turns retrograde in Cancer. This cosmic back-and-forth is going to cause miscommunications and travel delays, ultimately testing our patience. Be cognizant of the shifts in the sky to avoid dramatic flare-ups with others. And most importantly, we should be gentle with ourselves.

To read the entire strawberry full moon horoscope in addition to Aries, click the link below the picture:

Aries

You’ve achieved so much on the professional front, but you never took a moment to honor and appreciate your accomplishments. The strawberry full moon urges you to celebrate yourself by recognizing how far you have come in a short amount of time—and also, what is possible in the foreseeable future. Cheers and toast to your lucrative career—past, present, and future!

.

Photo: Getty Images

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Shortly after the Supreme Court blocked President Trump from immediately ousting a sitting governor from the Federal Reserve, the president struck a defiant note, signaling he would not surrender his long-running fight to gain more sway over one of the most important stewards of the U.S. economy.

In the eyes of Mr. Trump, the 5-to-4 decision reached by the justices on Monday amounted only to a legal setback, not an insurmountable defeat. Even as the court acknowledged the century-old tradition of political independence at the nation’s central bank, it did not totally foreclose on the president’s ability to try to dismiss its officials in the future.

On one hand, the court concluded that Mr. Trump had erred when he first tried to oust Lisa D. Cook, a Fed governor, over unsubstantiated allegations of mortgage fraud last year. Siding with a lower court, which had allowed Ms. Cook to remain in her role while the case played out, a majority of the justices said the Trump administration should have afforded Ms. Cook the formal ability to contest the accusations against her.

But the Supreme Court left much unresolved. The justices did not clearly articulate the full legal criteria that would allow Mr. Trump to fire Ms. Cook, who denies any wrongdoing and has never been charged with a crime. Nor did they wager an opinion on the exact allegations against her. And the court majority did not even prescribe the exact venue in which Ms. Cook should be allowed to respond to the allegations.

The president did not hesitate to seize on that legal ambiguity. In a social media post, he described the decision as merely a “procedural” matter and vowed to “take appropriate action immediately to make sure that someone who has committed wrongdoing will not be making vital decisions concerning the Welfare of the United States of America!”

The outcome left many legal scholars on edge, particularly given Mr. Trump’s well-documented desire to install more of his supporters at the top ranks of the central bank as part of his pursuit for lower borrowing costs.

“It may look to be an attempt to quiet the temptation by presidents to meddle with the Fed, but I read it in the opposite direction,” said Peter Conti-Brown, an expert on Fed governance at the University of Pennsylvania. “It’s an invitation for more meddling.”

He added: “This saga is not over.”

Ms. Cook still found reason to celebrate on Monday, as she conveyed in a statement after the court’s decision.

“Today’s ruling affirms a principle that has underpinned sound economic stewardship for generations: that the Federal Reserve must make all its policy decisions guided by evidence and independent judgment, free from political interference,” Ms. Cook wrote. “I am grateful for this decision, not for my own sake, but for the sake of the American people, whose economic well-being depends on a central bank that answers to its mission, not political intimidation,” she added.

Those stakes loomed large over the Supreme Court as it wrestled with Mr. Trump’s power over the Fed, and they appeared to factor heavily into the opinion written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

The liberal and conservative justices at one point cited the “ruinous financial panics” that had dotted the nation’s history, as they acknowledged the importance of a central bank that can operate free from political influence. And they channeled the country’s founders as they spoke to “the calamities that could arise from even the ‘suspicion’ of political manipulation of monetary policy.”

In addition to allowing Ms. Cook to keep her job for the time being, the split decision shot down the Trump administration’s argument that judges had no power to review its decision to fire a Fed official. It also undercut the premise that the president had nearly limitless ability to determine the conditions that would warrant such a removal.

Chief Justice Roberts said a decision accepting the view of Mr. Trump and his aides “would allow the president to remove a member of the Federal Reserve at any time, for any reason, without any notice before, and without any judicial check after.” That, the opinion said, “would turn for-cause protection into little more than at-will employment.”

For Scott Alvarez, the former general counsel for the Fed, the decision on Monday “helped to reinforce the court as a guardrail for Fed independence.” But it did not make the central bank impenetrable to further political encroachment.

For one, the Cook ruling was paired with a separate decision that vastly expanded the power of the executive branch by affirming Mr. Trump’s ability to fire all other independent regulators. In her dissent in Ms. Cook’s case, Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the decision to safeguard the Fed’s independence was “in serious tension” with the court’s ruling on the other agencies.

By invalidating the independence of those agencies, said Kathryn Judge, a Columbia Law School professor who was a Supreme Court law clerk for Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the central bank’s claim to that autonomy was more “precarious” given that for the last 90 years, “the Fed’s independence has really grown alongside the independence of other agencies.”

“There’s a path forward for the Fed to maintain meaningful independence, but it’s going to require more work to justify that independence in a way that really distinguishes it,” Ms. Judge added.

The saga around Ms. Cook began last year, after Bill Pulte, then the federal housing director, accused the Fed governor of misrepresenting her finances in order to obtain more favorable mortgage terms. His allegations soon prompted Mr. Trump to demand that Ms. Cook resign, before the president later moved to fire her.

Mr. Pulte, whom Mr. Trump has since tapped to serve as the director of national intelligence, previously said he referred the matter to the Justice Department. Shortly after the Supreme Court ruling, he asserted on social media that he believed Ms. Cook “will be indicted for mortgage fraud.”

The justices’ ruling in the case was narrow in a number of ways. The Supreme Court did not explain the conditions that would allow Mr. Trump to fire a Fed official for “cause,” the undefined criteria specified in the central bank’s chartering statute. It opposed Mr. Trump’s argument that presidents have uncontested authority to decide what qualifies as “cause,” but it also did not endorse Ms. Cook’s view that there was a high bar to meet.

Nor did the justices opine on the charges levied against Ms. Cook, citing the fact that she had not been afforded an opportunity to respond to the allegations, as required by law. That failure to give Ms. Cook the chance for rebuttal contributed heavily to the justices’ decision to allow her to continue serving at the Fed.

“To be clear, the ultimate question of whether the president can remove Cook for cause will depend in part on the underlying facts,” the majority wrote. “In this opinion, we have not addressed the facts, as they have yet to be found or analyzed under the relevant legal standards. Rather, we have simply addressed the parties’ arguments about the appropriate legal standards under which the facts must be evaluated.”

By leaving so many questions unanswered, the court gave Mr. Trump an opening to keep fighting, even if it is clear a majority does not want him to keep interfering with the Fed.

“This punt to the future is mostly a hope that the Trump administration and successive administrations will abandon this effort to meddle with the Federal Reserve,” Mr. Conti-Brown said.

Our Coverage of the Supreme Court

---

• Weedkiller Lawsuit: The Supreme Court sided with the manufacturer of Roundup, overturning a jury award for a Missouri man who claimed the widely used herbicide caused cancer in a decision that could have sweeping impacts on thousands of other Americans who similarly claim the product sickened them.

• Hawaii Gun Law: The justices struck down a Hawaii law that required gun owners to get permission before carrying a firearm onto private property like grocery stores, coffee shops and gas stations that are otherwise open to the public.

• Religious Rights Case: The court said that a Rastafarian whose dreadlocks were forcibly shaved by prison guards could not sue state employees for money.

• Assets Seized by Cuba: The justices cleared the way for Exxon Mobil to seek compensation from Cuban-owned entities over oil and gas assets the Communist country seized in 1960. 

• Securities and Exchange Commission: The court ruled that the S.E.C. can recover money that companies and individuals gained illegally, even if the agency is unable to prove that investors suffered a financial loss.

.

President Trump renewed his threat to fire Lisa D. Cook. Credit…Kenny Holston/The New York Times

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

.

.

“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn’t become a king, the palace instead becomes a circus. — Turkish proverb,”

 

Hmmmmm…History is repeating itself yet again!

 

Isaiah 59:14

New Living Translation

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

You might find these videos enlightening!

.

A. R. Bernard: one of many

.

.

Click the link below for the videos:

https://www.youtube.com

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Part of soccer’s beauty lies in its unpredictability.

Already in World Cup 2026, we have seen Morocco tie with five-time champion Brazil and Australia overturn the odds by beating Turkey. But few surprises will top a Cabo Verde team ranked 67th at the start of the tournament holding Spain—many pundits’ pick for the title—to a 0-0 draw.

But what goes into deciding whether a team wins, draws, or loses? Of course, the quality of the players and coaching staff matters. And recent advances in sports analytics, including real-time player geolocation metrics, have led to the adoption of data-driven in-game decisions. Top football teams increasingly rely on big data and predictive algorithms to gain an advantage.

But sports psychology plays a big role, too. And that is where I come in. I have a passion for sports in general and soccer in particular—it is the game I grew up playing in Germany.

Now, as a sport psychologist and director of the Global Sport Leadership Solutions Lab at Drexel University, I study how players and coaches can manage chaos on the pitch to strategically improve performance and win.

Below, I outline several modern psychological principles that are essential to all 48 teams battling it out in Mexico, Canada and the U.S. during the 2026 FIFA World Cup.

5 steps for soccer success

Disruption — It is true across all sports, and certainly in modern soccer, that the winning team will benefit from disrupting its opponent. Disruptive tactics can include brute-force tactical fouls, high-speed counterattacks that catch the opposition off balance, deceptive set pieces that create organized chaos, high-pressure tactics that force opponents into errors, and getting under the skin of opposition players.

Disrupting the organization and rhythm of the opposing team is both a mindset and a tactic that can lead to goal-scoring opportunities. A team that can disrupt an opponent’s flow can often overturn a skill disadvantage or demoralize weaker teams.

Attentional fitness — Scoring goals in international soccer is difficult. A great striker is worth his or her weight in gold. They not only possess exceptional dribbling and spectacular one-on-one skills but also strong “attentional fitness,” which requires cognitive efficiency and a work ethic to get into positions to score.

Such players are celebrated for their “coolness” and on-the-ball craft, but it is their psychological intelligence that makes them special. One of the first skills to break under pressure is the ability to focus. The quintessential goal scorer does not freeze.

One could call it “nerves of steel,” but that is just a metaphor for managing multiple sources of attention simultaneously and efficiently. Strikers such as England’s Harry Kane, France’s Kylian Mbappé, and Norway’s Erling Haaland maintain attentional control under pressure. They lock into the moment when it matters most and seamlessly shift between tasks.

Controlled mind-wandering — Mind-wandering is a spontaneous zoning out of your immediate surroundings. In sports, mind-wandering is often seen as negative because inattention at a crucial moment can lead to disaster. But it is difficult to maintain focus for 90-plus minutes during a soccer game. And new neuroimaging evidence suggests that in moments of mind-wandering, the brain is not at rest at all. Rather, it is just processing information differently.

As such, controlled mind-wandering, which involves active mental exploration, can be highly beneficial in performance sports—even if only for a few seconds. The best players seem to know when to focus and when to pull back. They sometimes look away from the ball and absorb a broader perspective of the game. Then, when a crucial game-scoring opportunity arises, they lock in their focus and are 100 percent present.

When researchers examined where Argentine great Lionel Messi looks, they found that his eyes are often off the ball. Common sense in soccer has been to keep your eyes on the ball, but new research suggests that the winner will also mind-wander and look away from the action. Messi’s brain can seemingly do things many of his opponents’ cannot; he appears to have world-class cognitive skills.

Resilience (for referees) — Soccer is one of the most difficult sports to officiate. Not only must referees be in excellent physical condition, they must also be able to manage the game emotionally. This has become increasingly difficult, with professional players routinely simulating injuries and an offside rule that is interpreted to within fractions of an inch.

And then there is one of the most difficult and controversial cognitive decisions in all of sports: the penalty kick, awarded for committing a foul in one’s own penalty box.

With the stakes so high and everyone watching, the modern World Cup referee must have exceptional multitasking, communications and management skills. Referees are part of the fabric of the match, whether they want to be or not. Everybody is judging them—even more so in 2026, since referees are wearing cameras on their temples, so the viewing public can see the game from their point of view. The psychological toolbox of the 2026 World Cup referee is complex, but it has to start with a good dose of psychological resiliency.

Tactical creativity — Tactical creativity in soccer is related to finding solutions on the pitch to complex individual or team situations. It almost always relies on divergent thinking and is often surprising and original. Research has shown that creativity is within everyone’s reach, including soccer players, especially if tactical creativity has been part of the training plan. As a result, the evolution of playing styles in elite soccer over the past few decades has shifted away from a structured, defense-heavy, possession-based system toward a modern, data-driven way to play based on pressing the opposing team high up the pitch. This requires players to take on multiple roles on the pitch. It requires a balance of both inspiration—or open-mindedness—and perspiration, or discipline.

Of course, to be creative, one has to have the freedom to experiment; “play like children,” U.S. head coach Mauricio Pochettino suggested. Tactical creativityis a key driver of the cognitive skill set that allows players such as Croatia’s Luka Modrić and Belgium’s Kevin De Bruyne to see several moves ahead. These modern soccer stars not only play soccer on a different level, but they also think soccer on a different level.

With the World Cup now underway, sports psychologists like myself—along with fans the globe over—can observe how athletes put some of these principles to work. And with any luck, the tournament will have “wow” moments of creativity that will be remembered for a lifetime.

.

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

.

Philip Yabut/Moment

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Old people cry a lot. I will see a sweet child in the street, watch a news story about a heroic rescue, or catch sight of a peony or of a full moon, and my eyes will be awash with tears. Whatever it is that I am feeling seems expressible only this way. People weep for joy or sorrow. I do neither, consciously.

Something comes over me, as it did the other day when I was sitting alone in an elegant room at the New York Society Library, waiting for an event at which I was to speak. It was one of those breathlessly hot days in mid-May, and the heat outside seemed to compound the still silence inside. For no apparent reason, I began to sing a song from “Carousel” called “If I Loved You.” I don’t mean that I muttered the song softly or mouthed the words or whispered. I mean that I sang clearly, nearly belting it out, as if I were onstage in the middle of the play: “If I loved you, / Words wouldn’t come in an easy way / Round in circles I’d go / Longin’ to tell you / But afraid and shy, / I’d let my golden chances pass me by.”

And sure enough, I started tearing up, as I tend to do often these days.

My singing at the Society Library lasted less than a minute. My event was about to begin, and I left the room thinking of what I was going to say. All the tentative beauty of the Rodgers and Hammerstein song had vanished along with my tears. But for a moment there, I was living in the world of the lyrics, a world of thwarted possibility and regret — not my own but rather that of everyone, the world I have arrived at after 85 years of living. And I was saying or singing to that world how I’d love you if I loved you.

Why do I tear up so often? I think it has to do with the past, how much past has built up inside me all these years. I first saw “Carousel” when I was 10 and was frightened by Billy Bigelow’s violent death. I saw it again when my granddaughter Jessica appeared in a school version of the play, and I heard “Soliloquy,” which includes the recurring phrase “my little girl,” not long after our daughter Amy died. Yet these days, I may tear up not for the play specifically but rather for all the years the play has rested with me, and whatever I’m feeling is both gone and remembered.

The past is a strange thing, both present and missing. In John Donne’s “Song: Go and Catch a Falling Star,” he creates a list of impossible things en route to his scoundrel’s lament that there’s no such thing as a woman who is faithful. “Tell me where all past years are,” he writes. It’s like the common phrase “Where did the time go?” to indicate that a stretch of time has passed too quickly to enjoy it fully. Here, Donne means the phrase literally. Where does time go? It is impossible to know.

And how suddenly the present becomes the past. Lifelong friends, here yesterday, gone today.

So many things lost in a life, my life, yours. So much left to articulate yearning. The proposition of “If I Loved You” is that, in fact, I do love you, but I cannot say it. I don’t have the words or the nerve. In Jane Austen’s “Emma,” the stoic Mr. Knightley says to the meddling heroine, “If I loved you less, I might be able to talk about it more.”

Is that why I tear up? Because I’m so overwhelmed with life as I approach the end of it that I’m at a loss for words, and all I can do is cry?

Overwhelmed. That seems to be the basis of weeping. Lord Byron contemplates losing his love, then regaining it. “How shall I greet thee? / With silence and tears.” In fact, tears are a form of silence. Voltaire called them “the silent language of grief.” They are for everything we cannot say, a tear for every word. A tear rolls down our face, glistens, then dries and disappears. Or we wipe it away, as if we are ashamed of it, as if we are getting rid of it. We never do, any more than we get rid of the pain that the endorphins were sent to cure.

In older age, the inexpressible may occur more frequently because one is approaching the ultimate inexpressibility of dying. We cannot know death until it is too late to report back on it. And we know the impossibility of knowing until all knowing has vanished into the past, the remembered, forgotten past.

Whatever happened to your life long ago, whatever carousel you were on, reminds you of yourself, who also happened long ago. So you’re tearing up for all that is gone, all that monumental past, vast and variegated. These days, I have so much past behind, and within me, it’s as if it bubbles over.

In my appearance that day, I said that one of the beauties of old age lies in appreciating what one has as opposed to ever wanting something new. This is true. But all that one has can gang up on you, too, and hit you when you least expect it. Such as the time I found myself all alone in an elegant room at the New York Society Library and sang my heart out.

.

Lidewij Mulder

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Japan’s catastrophic Tohoku-Oki earthquake in 2011 was so strong that it caused the entire country to “slip,” in some areas by as much as five or six millimeters, according to new research.

This “extraordinary observation,” as it is described in a new study published today in Science, was likely triggered by seismic waves bouncing off Earth’s core in the wake of the magnitude 9.0 quake. This never-before-seen event could present a previously unknown hazard associated with earthquakes, says Sunyoung Park, the study’s lead author and an assistant professor of geophysics at the University of Chicago.

Park and her team relied on an extensive Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) dataset to document subtle movement at sites across Japan in the minutes after the 2011 Tohoku-Oki quake. What they saw baffled them, Park says.

“The co-authors and I, we were all kind of initially puzzled by the observation,” Park says, referring to the movement of Japan. “Because this was such an unusual thing, we took a lot of time going through different possibilities.”

After ruling out other possible explanations for what they were seeing, such as a processing error in the GNSS data, the researchers concluded that “ScS waves”—seismic waves that travel through Earth’s mantle, ping off the planet’s iron core and return to the surface—had made Japan shift position.

Five or six millimeters—about the length of an average adult’s pinky toenail—might not sound like a lot. And it’s not uncommon for land to shift much more than that during earthquakes, causing “offsets,” where you might see, say, a disconnected road. But those movements are typically localized to areas near the center of the quake, Park says. Until now, researchers had never documented land movement at this scale—an entire country “nudged” by ScS waves, Park says.

“Dynamic earthquake triggering,” or “when seismic waves from an earthquake ‘nudge’ a fault already close to breaking into having an earthquake,” is well documented, says earthquake geologist Wendy Bohon. “However, this paper outlines a previously unrecognized source for this type of occurrence”: ScS waves. “The authors’ observations of triggered slip from this source across an area six to seven times greater than the area that broke during the main shock is extraordinary.”

In this case, it took about 15 minutes or so for the waves generated by the quake to travel to Earth’s core and back. The “slip” appears to have happened gradually, possibly over the course of around 100 or 200 seconds, so people in Japan probably wouldn’t have felt it, Park says. But it’s unclear if that would be the case for future ScS-triggered slips in Japan or elsewhere.

More research is needed to better understand why exactly this earthquake made Japan slip and whether future events such as this might be more damaging. The Tohoku-Oki quake was one of the world’s largest and most devastating: the initial shock and following tsunami killed more than 18,000 people and caused an estimated $220 billion in damage (in 2011 dollars), according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The new findings could help people around the world better prepare for possible dangers hidden in the aftermath of quakes, Park says.

“I think we should be aware of the fact that there could be this potential triggering of an event many minutes after [an earthquake’s] main shaking has passed,” she says.

This “new type of seismic hazard” is one which “we might want to think about,” she adds.

.

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________

Click the link below the picture

.

Scientists have revealed insights from ancient scrolls buried by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius nearly 2,000 years ago, after an AI breakthrough helped uncover some of their secrets.

The trove of hundreds of scrolls was buried in Herculaneum by the famous eruption in A.D. 79 that also destroyed nearby Pompeii. Uncovering the contents of the fragile carbonized papyrus is a puzzle that has fixated researchers since their rediscovery three centuries ago, but only in recent years has AI-enabled “digital unwrapping” become possible.

Researchers from the University of Kentucky and Naples on Thursday revealed recovered texts from authors previously lost to history, including philosophical takes on ethics, the arts, human behavior, and theology.

In one text, an unknown author appears to warn against excessive impulse. Another key concept, researchers say, is phronesis, ancient Greek for “practical wisdom.” In another passage, the ancient author writes: “We will inquire into something, but we will not grasp it, if in some way we depart from ourselves and from our own nature.”

“It’s been a long time since the classical period, and we feel a distance from that culture. And then you read the words, and then the distance shrinks immediately,” Brent Seals, a computer science professor at the University of Kentucky and one of the foremost experts in the digital restoration of cultural antiquities, told NBC News.

“They were worried about living a good life and understanding the world,” he added.

Previous attempts to unwrap the scrolls, discovered in the ruins of a Herculaneum villa thought to have belonged to Julius Caesar’s father-in-law, have produced mixed results.

In the 18th century, an Italian monk, Father Antonio Piaggio, invented a device to gently unroll the carbonized papyrus. It was painstaking work: It took four years to unravel the first scroll, revealing ancient Greek texts, and many more years to unfold 500 more. But most were so carbonized they crumbled apart.

Since then, papyrologists have patiently tried to put the pieces together, like parts of an ancient puzzle, revealing one letter and word at a time.

They also kept another 600 badly carbonized scrolls — impossible to open with mechanical methods without reducing them to ash — intact and carefully stored, most of them in the National Library in Naples.

While modern 3D X-ray technology has allowed some insight into the scrolls since, extracting text has proved especially challenging, given the partially destroyed papyrus is as black as the ink.

But a breakthrough came in 2023, when three students used machine-learning algorithms to extract ancient Greek letters from a “virtually unwrapped” scroll, claiming a $1 million prize for the discovery, which has led to rapid advancements since.

“In the past, it would take more than one month to decipher one phrase. Now we get full texts,” said Gianluca del Mastro, professor of papyrology at Naples’ University Campania Luigi Vanvitelli.

“It is an amazing feeling because I am the first with my colleagues to be able to read the ideas of philosophers from the third, second, and the first century B.C. It is a completely new world for us,” he said.

Some breakthroughs have been unexpected. One scroll “was marked in the catalog as having no visible ink,” Seals said, only for researchers to find that it did, and “may be one of the oldest Roman scrolls ever discovered.”

So far, researchers have managed to read only 10% of the scrolls. On Thursday, the University of Kentucky announced a new $1 million prize to anyone able to decipher a complete scroll, a feat the researchers once considered impossible, by June next year.

.

A Herculaneum scroll with red laser lines being scanned at the Institut de France by Brent Seales and his team.EduceLab

.

.

Click the link below for the complete article:

.

__________________________________________